Showing posts with label trust me. Show all posts
Showing posts with label trust me. Show all posts

Friday, June 22, 2007

It's been a long, interesting week. I've found myself acutally thinking (quietly and circumspectly to be sure, but with more than a little certainty) that I could, in fact, support the notion of Impeaching George Bush....not for his War on Terror (that, the Economic Strength we enjoy, and the Judges he's appointed, are plusses to his credit) but for his support of this Awful McCain-Kennedy Illegal Immigrant Amnesty Bill.

This Bill is just wrong...it starts out wrong, and gets worse as we look under the hood. The very idea of giving a Gutting to the existing law of the land, paying only knockoff lip service to the concept of promoting Citizenship and Assimilation, but in reality just passing out legal status to proven lawbreakers, for the sole purpose of (very little) economic benefit.

Then, we have the specter of Bush ignoring his remaining few Conservative supporters, and generally just not getting it...maybe he has had a head injury that's not been reported? He's playing the 'dumb' role too well, nowadays. Time for a true wake up, George, before you find that the only supporter left to you is your wife...and maybe your dog. Is his name Buddy?

Bush isn't the only politician ignoring the very large segment of Americans against this Amnesty Bill. There's support for the Bill, coming from somewhere, but that support isn't from We the People.

Ya know, I believe that if we 'Citizens' knew what little of what we say to our duly-elected 'representatives', or for that matter who we vote for on various election days for whatever office, means to those in charge, we might be shocked.

If we, as taxpaying Americans, had a clue as to how little our opinions matter to these elected bozos, how tiny our concerns stack up as compared to the desires of the huge Economic Powers and Forces that really shape our lives, we might be somewhat surprised.

Well, maybe not surprised, but certainly feeling the need to take a bath...to remove that 'used', 'manipulated', and 'basement-grown, like a mushroom' feeling that we've grown so complacent to.

Look where we're at...we've watched both sides of the political aisle equally ignore what seems to be a national concern and consensus, then we see the Republicans turn on the Conservatives, the Democrats turn on the Liberals...those clues should cause all of us to realize our true use and value, that is, herded when needed, nudged and nuanced when a 'reaction' is desired, just generally kept stirred but contented.

Pass the soap?





Ahhh, before I forget; I owe a h/t to Ol'Broad for the link on Congressional Approval Ratings; and to SondraK for some of the HotAir jabs.

And to Yahoo for teh Sex and Drugs stuff...

Thursday, May 24, 2007

I know, it's a syndicated, paid thing. But there's only two PJM bloggers I will read with regularity (they're like Citrucel for Blogs?) Unless there's a good link dragging me to 'em, I pass on the others. By 'read regulary', these two favored PJM sites are on my Google Reader.

One is Jeff Goldstein, at Protein Wisdom. PW is the first blog I started reading, back in the early spring of '06. Jeff is a skilled writer, a mesmerizing writer-type who actually won't put me to sleep when he's on a roll (there's a few 'writers' who've managed to do that...)

Jeff's had some issues, over the past year, and is struggling to get back to his prior levels. I hope he does. Although I don't know much about his earlier levels, given my late arrival as a reader, but it had to be good...

My other PJM favorite is Iowahawk.

I'm glad he doesn't spew out 30 posts a day; I can't (and won't try) to keep up with bloggers who do. Iowahawk's good for just one or two a week, if that many. That's one thing I look for in a blog: infrequency. I can't read Insty for that reason: he must live inside his box, with little time to get out. Other PJM's do the same. That's not blogging; that's missing life. Or, worse, doing it for pay. Paid blogging isn't much blogging, either, it's Drudging. Give me an Iowahawk over an Insty any day.

Back to Iowahawk...he's the king of jestic irony, the pinnacle of sardonic wittery. Of course, I'm not going as far as, say, Dan Collins (jeez, man, if modern writers have that effect on you, stick to 16th century classics...at least you'd be choking on dust) but I'll give him his due. If he puts out a novel, I'll buy a stack for gifts...

Speaking of Infrequent Blogging, I'm heading out, tomorrow, for a Nantahala Holiday. Probably won't be posting, much. I'll carry my laptop, but won't struggle to find a hotspot.

Got a life, you know...

;D

BTW, this is my Blogiversary. Hmmmph. Without any help or aid, what you see is what you get, pure experimentation. I might keep it up.

Powered by ScribeFire.

Thursday, May 10, 2007

Zach Wamp, co-author of the soon-to-be-released book The Fred Factor, finally says what we all know: if Fred Thompson doesn't run in 2008, Republicans are going to lose the election. Big-time.
“The ‘Fred Factor’ is the factor of our party having a shot of winning the White House despite the odds,” Wamp said. “The next President of the United States must rise above the division in the United States to bring our country together and unify us around an agenda to meet the challenges of the next generation."

“We need to nominate someone like Fred who can speak to the independents and bring Reagan Democrats back to our party, and reach over into a base that we frankly lost in the last election. We only held the hardcore Republicans in this country last fall...”
That's spot on, Zach, and deserving of hilighting and frequent repetition, because it's the only bit of reality I've heard that resonates with me concerning this upcoming elective debacle.

Last week's VP debate proved to me there is no outstanding candidate I would consider even VP material. Giuliani? Sorry, not conservative. Gun Controller in New York City as Mayor. Wacky love life. Mitt Romney? He's a Mormon (not that there's anything wrong with that, but it is a cult) and has some wacky views. John McCain? You think I'm a little loose-cannonish? He needs an attached team of handlers to keep him in line. Bombs out frequently. The other 5 candidates at the debate? Who? No way they will get any votes from what Gill says is the important vote bloc the Republicans have to have to compete for...
“You’ve got to bring back those Reagan blue-collar Democrats in Michigan, in Pennsylvania, in Ohio and in Wisconsin to counter what I still think is going to be Hillary Clinton at the top of the Democratic ticket,”
(emphasis mine)
So, if this little 200-page paperback doesn't kickstart Fred's campaign, we can look forward to assuming the position of opposition to some bad liberal policies for the next 8 or so years.

Which, from a standpoint of Democrats, is exactly what they've been doing for 8 years, or more. The balance in this country is centered, or should be, but to give up without even putting up a good fight isn't even sporting.

So, Fred, for the sake of what's left of the Republican Party, you have to stand up and run. And you might have some fun with it; remember what Ronnie said?
"Politics is supposed to be the second oldest profession. I have come to realize that it bears a very close resemblance to the first..." Ronaldus Magnus

Powered by ScribeFire.

Tuesday, March 13, 2007

"But the pain..." he said. "Pain," she sniffed. "A human can override any nerve in the body."

"Ever sift sand through a screen?" she asked. "We sift people to find the humans."


Paul Atreide's test, at the beginning of Frank Herbert's Dune
General Pace's remarks, expressing his personal opinion on Gays in the Military in particular, and Gays in Society in general, today touched off a firestorm of criticism. General Pace told The Chicago Tribune Tuesday that
“I believe homosexual acts between two individuals are immoral and that we should not condone immoral acts."

He said he supports the “don’t ask, don’t tell policy,’’ explaining that "I do not believe the United States is well served by a policy that says it is OK to be immoral in any way."

"As an individual, I would not want [acceptance of gay behavior] to be our policy, just like I would not want it to be our policy that if we were to find out that so-and-so was sleeping with somebody else's wife, that we would just look the other way, which we do not. We prosecute that kind of immoral behavior..."
This firestorm again brings to the fore two matters: the question of whether Homosexuality should be tolerated in the Military, and as an ancilliary question, whether anyone can express their opinion, and expect to be quashed like a bug for their expression.

We've seen, recently, both Dick Cheny and Ann Coulter bashed for their statements; now it's General Pace's turn to be ground to pulp in the Political Correctness Mill.

I'll ignore the second question (or, if you will, defy it) by addressing the first.

Frankly, I'm sick of the moral decay in or society, and the degredation of character I believe is resulting from our slide into 'Moral Relevance', propagated by Liberal Culture.

I'll tell you exactly where I stand on the issue of Homosexuality, and why I quoted a line from an old book that probably you've never read. It's a matter of people who are just people, and people who are Human.

I strongly support Gen. Pace's remarks, and his beliefs. He's right.

First, the Military should not be made into a cauldron of social gamesmanship. They have a difficult duty and a responsibility to this country, and that responsibility is much more important than to allow these fighting social issues to ferment.

Morality is not all about Religion. Some people who Church have morality, others who've never been have more. But, in these times, we are seeing a regression of Human morality, a degredation of Humans. people who are Human will face a moral trial, like homosexuality, and turn away from it. Some, weaker, people succumb to their narcissistic, animalistic desires, and lose...their Humanity.

There's a lot of people in this world, but, after the trials of life, few can remain Human.

powered by performancing firefox

Sunday, March 11, 2007

There's this neat little test, designed to weed out the voters who really should stay home on election day...you know, the ones that succumb to Machine Politics, found mostly in our largest cities, the 'voters' that party hacks bus to the precincts, push into the booth, and send them home with a ham or a few bucks...Not that I've anything against Memphis or Chicago or New York or Boston or...but, you do notice that some people keep getting re-elected, even after they drive a young girl in a pond and leave her to drown...but I digress.

From the site's Mission Statement:
DontVote.org's mission is to combat the "Get out the Vote" movement that is pushed by organizations that would like to increase the number of uneducated voters to help their cause. DontVote.org encourages people to Vote, but only AFTER they have educated themselves on the policies and individuals for which they are voting. Voting should be considered a privilege and exercised with responsibility and discretion. Just like a final exam, responsible voting requires self-education and thought. When the time comes to cast your ballot, if you don't know for what or whom you're voting, then DON'T VOTE.

DontVote.org


How did I do?

You scored 348 out of 350 possible points, or 99.43%

A+

Not only should you vote, you should consider a career in politics.

Thanks, but I couldn't afford the pay cut...
;D

h/t, Linda SoG

Wednesday, February 28, 2007

I pulled up the Las Vegas Sun this morning with the sole purpose of checking the latest word on Pacman's problems. This article on Project Prevention's Barbara Harris caught my eye. Pac will have to wait.

Project Prevention pays addicted women (and men) ca$h to take birth control, or complete sterilization procedures. For long-term birth control shots (Depo-Provera, lasts 3 month) the addict gets $200; for a tubal ligation, a $300 one-time (after the procedure) cash infusion. Men get $300 for a vasectomy. What do you need to qualify? Papers proving you're a loser addicted individual who really doesn't need to have six or eight kids anyways...mug shots, arrest records, whatever paper trail is proof that you should re-think children at this time. (Probably more paper than Tennessee wanted to give out a driver's liscense to illegal immigrants...)
"There is nothing positive that comes to a woman who gives birth to eight addicted babies. These kids are born with the cards stacked against them. The cycle just repeats itself."
Of course, there are adversaries to this program. Any liberal who sees who funds this program (Robert Scaife, Dr. Laura Schlessinger, and a biggie who's unamed) will immediately send a moonbat wacko. Why should any conservatives get in the way of a good abortion? Why shouldn't the child be conceived, grow to say, 7 or eight months, and then pull the plug? That way, a good abortion doctor gets to keep his practice, and the liberals can feel good about their funding.

There are arguments about 'The New Eugenics!'. Those arguments are short-sighted; eugenics as culminated in atrocities by Hitler was a wide-spread movement by scientists during the early 20th century that resulted not only in the Holocaust but thousands of unfortunate sterilizations by court order in the U.S. This program is completely voluntary, and has the benefit, again, of preventing abortions. If a woman is not 'far gone' enough to get the shots or the IUD implacements ($200) then there won't be any sterilization. She can get help, and return to the real world, then resume life with an option to have kids...the right way.

Is the program racist? No, more whites have opted in than blacks and hispanics combined. Damn, another liberal rug jerked out from under them...

So, I'll have to support this program. Imagine that...choosing an option that, instead of killing a fetus (who might just be a valid human some day), gives a woman a choice to 'opt out', and do the thing that affects only her individual self...
"If you oppose what we do, if you believe these women have a right to keep popping out babies," Harris said, "then you better be ready to raise some yourself."

powered by performancing firefox

Sunday, January 21, 2007

I'm sitting here getting ready to watch (2) NFL playoff games back-to-back. For SOME reason, this topic jumped out at me (along with the desire to abscond with the code for this neat little .swf file right out from under a liberal's nose)...

Basically, Americans are getting fat, dumb and happy, and spoiled. That's a theme and theory I've witnessed and lamented for years. The proof is in the rise of Liberalism, and the desire of liberals to have a "Nanny State" care for them from the cradle to the grave. 'Cradle to Grave' was a complaint given to Hillary Rodham's first foray into governing, when Bill gave her a blank check and said, "Stay busy, don't bother me, I've got interns to train. Go bother Janet Reno!"

Now, she's BAACCKKKKK...between her and Obamabama, we're gonna be in deep doo-doo in '09, if either one of these two lefties gets into office.

On to the game (prediction: Chicago)

Obesity Trends* Among U.S. Adults
Source: Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, CDC.
(*BMI 30 or ~ 30 lbs overweight for 5'4 person)

Roll over year to display map for that year...

Friday, January 19, 2007

We did it in the '80's. We killed an old satellite in low earth orbit, using an ASAT weapon.

From WIKI
Since then we've declared "freedom of action in space", a policy authorized by Pres. Bush in August 2006 to "deter others from either impeding those rights or developing capabilities intended to do so."

So what do the Chinese do? Of course, they take the bait.
"China last week successfully used a missile to destroy an orbiting satellite, U.S. government officials told CNN on Thursday, in a test that could undermine relations with the West and pose a threat to satellites important to the U.S. military.
I guess the spectacle of being told "NO!" by the mighty USA had the opposite effect, huh?

I can understand the Chinese reaction. Why in the world should they kowtow to what WE tell them to do? If we have the 'rights' and 'capabilities' to blast satellites into orbit, and to blast their GPS satellites out of orbit, what and who says that the US is the only entity capable of doing so?

Of course it would be nice to be the only country with this technology, and not have to worry about anyone else (other than the old Soviet remnants) taking out satellites, so our GPS satellites and 'other' spy equipment will be unimpeded if the Chinese decide to take back Taiwan, or whereever else they decide to go (on the tab of the American WalMart shopper).

It's just not right that we can put out a 'policy directive' and expect everyone else on the planet (or off of it) to humbly and graciously kowtow to our wishes.

Hmmph...if it were the US and someone tried to impose such an impediment on our capabilities, then wouldn't we respond the same way?

Now, we have to 'protect' our low orbiting satellites.

THIS is gonna be fun...


from here


powered by performancing firefox

Monday, January 15, 2007

OUR LIVES BEGIN TO END
THE DAY WE BECOME SILENT
ABOUT THINGS THAT MATTER.
-Martin Luther King Jr., American
civil rights leader (1929-1968)

"It's mind-boggling to hide someone that easily in plain sight," Craig Akers said. "It's hard to believe that someone could be that brazen. We've lost our sense of community."
This from the stepfather of Shawn Hornbeck, the child kidnap victim who went missing for 4 ½ years...and was found within 50 miles of his home.

We can sort through the sordid details later; what simply blows my mind is the fact that the kid, though 11, was held for four and a half years, with age-progression posters created and dissiminated by his tireless parents, and not a bit of attention was paid by the people living near...or in...the community. He was held in an apartment!

With no curtains!. It's not like Kirkwood is isolated.



The 'community' included a landlord seeing Shawn Hornbeck sleeping in the apartment when he fixed a plumbing problem.
Hornbeck also said he never went to school his entire time in captivity. But Craig Akers could not explain why his son did not escape when his captor went to work or why the boy never told a neighbor something was wrong.
There are reasons the kid was afraid to escape; I recall the Patty Hearst kidnapping and psychological torture that resulted in her brainwashing...and bank robbery.

The 300-pound pizza dude who kidnapped the kids was known to his neighbors...

Krista Jones, 25, who lives in an apartment across from Devlin, said he had a reputation for being a "road-rage weirdo" who constantly threatened to call the police on neighbors.
To sum this up, a quote from a Kirwood resident...
"We take it easy. We don't pay attention," Smith said. "Because we do pride ourselves (that) we're a quiet neighborhood. We're a loving family neighborhood. We have all middle class America here. I think that puts blinders on our eyes sometimes."
That is exactly the problem, not only in this thankfully-resolved kidnapping, but in our entire American Mindset. We are going along fat, dumb and happy, while around us, people see us as evil...and are planning to do somthing about it.

Saturday, January 13, 2007

Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting

*


Lots of Scooby Biscuits enjoyed on your watch...

Friday, January 12, 2007










Tears run from the eyes of U.S. President George W. Bush during a ceremony in honor of Medal of Honor winner Marine Cpl. Jason Dunham in the East room of the White House in Washington, January 11, 2007. Cpl. Dunham
Reuters - Thu Jan 11, 11:47 AM ET


Yes, we have a Surge of Retreatists in the wake of the President's speech. You know, it probably doesn't matter that the President took a different approach, and will change the very nature of the operation in Iraq; nor does it matter that the President admitted that the tactics used weren't working. The only thing that matters to the Partisan Jihadists is that they use any weapon they can to 'get' the President. He could take any course, pull out tomorrow, and the underlying hatred the moonbats have for George Bush would drive them to attack him. There's no way for that snakepit of extremists to see George Bush in any other light, or to find any reason to go along with anything he does!


UPDATE 1/13/07 8:07 AM

Not all the politicians have come out against President Bush. This, from John McCain, is suprisingly supportive.
"I believe that together these moves will give the Iraqis and Americans the best chance of success..."

and a question to Demobats:
"I believe these individuals ... have a responsibility to tell us what they believe are the consequences of withdrawal in Iraq," he said. "If we walk away from Iraq, we'll be back, possibly in the context of a wider war in the world's most volatile region.


McCain just gained a couple points in my '08 consideration. Just a couple, mind you, he's still a ways off...

This is a fragment...I'll return later with more substance. But you probably already get my drift...

Thursday, January 11, 2007

MS-13 took a slight hit in Nashville today.
According to the Nashville City Paper article today, we've had this "pack of jackals" for 11 years.

"Mara Salvatrucha" is Salvadoran (meaning "fear us"; or, ''Mother's Stupidity" (for not having that abortion?)).

(Photo from Gang War Blog)

The gang has a propensity for not only dealing drugs and guns (the usual fare of these lovelies) but bashing the brains out of rival gangs, including the ephemeral Bloods and Crips, and generally assualting whoever pisses them off, with little or no warning ...

"MS-13 members nationally are notorious for displaying unprovoked violence against rival gang members and members of the community, not to protect profits but just to protect their power"
and
“MS-13 is pound for pound one of the most violent gangs in the western hemisphere...”, from Special Agent Jim Cavanaugh of the Federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms (ATF) .
Here's the list of the 13 Miscreant Sonsabitches as reported today:
Oscar Serrano, a/k/a “Diablin”
Escolastico Serrano, a/k/a “Chito”
Omar Hirbin Gomez, a/k/a “Lil Homie”
David Alexander Gonzalez, a/k/a “Psycho”
Ernesto Isai Mendez-Tovar, a/k/a “Joker,” a/k/a “Choey”
Francisco Dago Mendez, a/k/a “Silent”
Walter Hernandez, a/k/a “Spanky”
Nery Garballo-Vasquez, a/k/a “Cuervo”
Eliseo Iglesias, a/k/a “Smokey”
Ronald Fuentes, a/k/a “Spia”
Ericka Cortez, a/k/a “Shorty”
Geovanni Pena, a/k/a “Rata”
Jose Alfaro, a/k/a “Liche”
I went to Urban Dictionary to try to find out what a "spia" was, they hadn't heard of it either. Given my propensity for being on the Cutting Edge when it comes to defining disdain for obviously expendable elements of society, I left for the editors this submission for "Spia":
Found as a nickname of a MS-13 Gang Member arrested in Nashville, one of the 13 busted on January 11, 2006:
“Diablin”, “Chito”, “Lil Homie”, “Psycho”, “Joker, a/k/a “Choey”, “Silent”, “Spanky”, “Cuervo”, “Smokey”, “Spia”, “Shorty”, “Rata” and “Liche”.

Spia isn't defined yet, so I guess, given the company he keeps, this term 'spia' is related to 'spittle' or maybe 'soap' (what his father should have used instead of his mother...)

"Yo, Lil' Homie, don't pick up the spia when you're in the prison shower, or you might feel like you did when spanky got too much cuervo! Ha Ha, spia from the shorty!"
We'll have to wait and see what the editors think...

Maybe this is what we hear from these laddies on a slow night? (translation to understandable english applied):

Diablin: "Boyz, we have to shake down the Crips tonite. They tagged a stop sign over near our Kroger!"

Smokey: "Can't we just kill another civvie instead? They don't shoot back."

Silent:

Liche:"I think we should recruit a couple dozen more 12 year olds. We need some more kids to sell our stuff. Ranks are getting thin, everyone's turning 18!"

Spia:"Nahhh, they come to us. We's got Appeal!"

Spanky"That's right! Status, Power, Respect, where else they gonna get that?

Silent:

Rata:"Yeah, the excitement is all here too. Where else can they come and live the Rap Life?

Joker: "Did you hear the one about..."

Psycho: "Ah, shaddup Joker. You gonna make me break one off in you one day!"

We'll keep track of these boyz, and the ACLU's efforts to free them on technicalities... ;D

Wednesday, January 10, 2007

Ahhhh, I just listened to the President..he's out there, it's time to make or break, putting his (and our) credibility on the line. Do we leave the fragile Iraqi nation to crumble (like we did in Vietnam), and invite even more killings if the sectarian violence gets waay out of hand, or an extremist Islamic nation forms,with the worst of the Islamic Ideology allowed to frement? A new Kymer Rouge? Or do we try to prop up with a surge the nascent government, and while doing so, try to stand behind our country's ideology, which is supposedly superior to that of the Extremist Islamicists?

My wife tells me, "I'm ready for the troops to come home." Yes, we all are. Is it time to forget everything we've done in the past years of war, and pull out? Or do we give it one more surge, to try to right the ship?

I guess I will have to stand with the President on this one. One more try, to be on the ideological side that feels morally correct. I don't mind being in the minority of supporters of the President. I've always felt that I'll stick with my friends, have their backs through thick and thin, and not cut out if the going gets rough. That's why the President wants to succeed in helping the Iraqis generate a democracy, and that's why I will have to stand with him.

Absolutely No One on either side of the Republican-Democratic schism appeals to me. Zero, none, nada.

Democrats have a long way to go to get my attention; there are few who will support 2nd Amendment Rights (that's my main benchmark; everybody's got to have at least one...I feel that if a person or a party as a whole wants to limit an individual's right to self-protection, and keep the guns for it's own purposes...that party is dangerous and should not receive support, no matter what other qualifications he, she or it may present).

Dick Morris and Eileen McGann have an Op-Ed today in the New York Post pretty much running a want-ad for a Conservative Candidate for '08. Unlike the 'Crats, who have such stellar candidates as Hillary (Gaggage with Baggage) Clinton:


Then there's that Hussein Guy...Trauma O'Bauma (who is the worst Gun controller of the lot; he had to work hard to get this honor). Obama Opposes gun rights (NRA rating-F; Illinois Citizens for Handgun Control Rating-A).

OK, what about Republicans? From Dick Morris (whom I trust as much as I do a pit bull attached to my hindquarters)
Rudy Guiliani? Pro-choice, pro-affirmative action, pro-gay rights, pro-immigration, pro-gun control
Stop right there. 'Nuff said.
Sen. John McCain? The McCain of the Kennedy-McCain bill to let illegal immigrants become citizens? Of the "anti-torture" bill to handcuff our agents when they question terrorists? Of the McCain-Feingold campaign-finance bill that the right wing hates? Of the Lieberman-McCain anti-global-warming bill that addresses a problem the right doesn't believe in? That John McCain for president? The right wing can't tolerate his apostasy even if he is the pro-life candidate that Rudy isn't.
OK, admission here. Pro-life isn't a big deal to me. We have an overpopulation problem on this planet. People should be smart enough to know that. Do I have to trot this out every day?

I'm not saying that Abortion should be as free as water. Birth Control before Abortion is even needed should be as free as water (hell, put Birth Control in the water, and make childbirth a regulated, licensed sport...prove you are able to raise 1, or 2, kids, and can stay married long enough to raise them, and can support them until they are past the age where they can trouble society). I know that won't happen in our lifetimes. But if it doesn't, there are going to be some shortened lifetimes for a lot of people, somewhen in the future. But that's another topic for another day...
Mitt Romney, who was pro-life and then switched to pro-choice when he ran to become Massachusetts governor and now is switching back again as he runs for president? The Mitt Romney who said "I will protect and defend the right of Massachusetts women to choose?" The Romney who has flip-flopped on gay issues? Will the right wing back him? No way.
Personally, I have a hard time looking at anything out of Massachusettes and being comfortable with it.
Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich? A man who has never valued the right-wing social agenda?
I like Newt Gingrich (who has as much chance of being elected as I do, given the Left Wing Surge, brought on by Bush's NeoCons who couldn't figure out how to win a war).

Is there no candidate out there who can be man (or woman) enough to deserve to run this country? Not Yet.

Can we please get Reagan cloned?

Saturday, January 6, 2007

Now...What's up with this???

Guard soldiers back off from armed men out of Mexico



"A Border Patrol official says National Guard troops acted appropriately this week when they abandoned their post near the border southwest of Tucson as four gunmen approached from Mexico."
The National Guard was deployed on the border states (Texas, New Mexico, Arizona and California) by Pres. Bush last April. For what purpose?
"Guardsmen are strictly in a backup role along the border. That means performing administrative functions, building roads and fences, even conducting surveillance in some cases, such as with the team near Tucson.

But they're never to confront or attempt to apprehend border crossers."
WTF?? You mean, they are there just to take notes? Hold a clipboard, like a backup quarterback? To merely watch, and if they see some armed men, to run for cover and call someone else??

This is absolutely crazy.

There's one Arizona State Senator who agrees:
"State Sen. Chuck Gray, a Republican and retired Mesa police officer, was surprised that Guard members would run in the face of an armed threat, unless they were seeking protective cover.

"I can tell you, as a police officer of 10 years, there was never a policy to flee," he said. "If they're running for cover, that's different than running away."
Indeed. It would seem the teeth are pulled from our National Guardsmen.

What's this country's Armed Services coming to, if they are challenged in our own country and instructed to back off from armed drug runners? To hide before they are even seen?

Political Correctness will be the death of all of us...

Arizona National Guardsmen monitor the border

H/T Flap's Blog; and Hosedragger

Reeses' Pieces




Floyd Reese resigned from his General Manager's position with the Titans yesterday.

In other breaking news, the sun came up in the east this morning, and Saddam is still dead.

This change was expected. I posted, after the 0-3 start, a long-winded narrative on the Reese/Fisher situation; check it out if you like. But nothing much has changed ; Reese's goose was already cooked by then.

The dramatic improvemens from a losing 0-5 start to a 8-8 finish had nothig to do with Floyd Reese; those immediate changes are credited to Jeff Fisher...and Vince Young. A General Manager's work is not field operations, or play calling. You can't measure a GM over the course of a season's worth of games, or even a couple of seasons. He's a long-term fixture (which makes the Matt Millen non-firing in Detroit even less understandable).

So, what brought down Floyd Reese? Mainly, his two top priorities: drafting, and contracting.

Sure, he got a few good picks (The Tennessean mistakenly credits him with Vince Young; that was soley Bud Adam's choice). But he made some bad ones too...#2 last year was LenDale White, who hasn't showed us a thing. PacMan (well, the jury's still out...Ouch!), 1st round pick in 2004 (I wanted Antrel Rolle), if he keeps his nose clean during this long offseason, we'll be surprised; Woolfolk, 1st round pick in 2003...who?; Heinous Haynesworth (first round, 2002) gave major trouble this year, and will he stay a Titan?

And the contracts...wow. Every other team in the league was probably looking at the Titans like they had serious brain damage...especially after the McNair fiasco, and the bloodletting of marquee players to get under the cap. All while New England was winning 3 Super Bowls.

I'm not going to re-hash this old stuff. But I'm not going to cry over broken pieces, either...

Saturday, December 9, 2006




Today's Tennessean published an article describing the work of two Professors, Michael Birdwell and Tom Nolan, in locating the exact site of Sgt. Alvin York's WWI heroics, for which he won the medal of honor. Here's a diary, written by Alvin York, describing his activities (and his complete faith in God).

The article describes the finding of a "collar disk", a button so to speak...
"It" was a collar disk, a piece of metal a little larger than a nickel. The object, part of a World War I American soldier's uniform, was stamped with the number "328" and the letter "G," which stands for York's regiment and company, respectively.


Well, almost immediately, there was some dissent. In the story chat that follows the article, a commentor (who has some physical evidence (21 .45 ACP shell casings) found some 600 meters from the 'button'.

Here's the entire rebuttal post from Lieutenant Colonel Douglas Mastriano:

The claim by Michael Birdwell and Tom Nolan that they found the spot where York earned the Medal of Honor is 100% wrong. Their declaration is not supported by battlefield archeology, German archival data, military doctrine or terrain analysis and most importantly, the Germans that York fought / captured were never there. There is NO possible way that Alvin York earned the Medal of Honor in the location where they claim. It is impossible.

No research in the German Archives in Stuttgart, Freiburg, Potsdam, Ulm or Bavaria
The biggest obstacle that Birdwell and Nolan face is that they did not spend a single day in the German archives, where the most important York related documents are. They are missing at least 100 essential documents. Because of this, they went into the Argonne with only half of the story and ended up in the wrong valley, finding artifacts from a different battle, a battle that York, and the Germans he fought, did not participate in. This claim is rife with numerous other problems and is not helped by the simple fact that the core of their team has no military experience. A trained military eye can see that their claim is not logical from a tactical point of view.

The Germans that York captured were never there
The site could not be the spot for the simple reason that the Germans York captured - were NEVER there. The empirical/hard evidence confirms this - that York fought and captured soldiers from the German 125th and 120th Württemberg Regiments and the 210th Prussian. There is only one spot in the entire Argonne Forest where these three units overlapped – and it is actually 600 meters away from the Birdwell/ Nolan claim. The location where Birdwell asserts as the York spot is the flank of the German 122nd Regiment. York captured NO 122nd soldiers and he never fought there. What Birdwell uncovered is a different fight altogether that transpired as the German right flank collapsed AS A RESULT of York's actions - several hours later.

The picture does not add up
In January 1919, just three after York performed his heroic deed, the 82nd Infantry Division conducted a formal investigation into the York story in order to see if he deserved the Medal of Honor. As part of the investigation, photographs were taken. The spot selected by Birdwell / Nolan does not look like the 1919 photos at all. Further evidence that they are in the wrong place.

Finding the right York spot
So, what about the York spot – where is it? A group of military officers, veterans, researchers, family members and battlefield archeologists, calling themselves The Sergeant York Discovery Expedition (SYDE), came together to solve this mystery. After years of painstaking research and nearly 40 days searching in the Argonne Forest near Châtel Chéhéry, France – the exact location where Alvin York fought off the determined attacks of the German Imperial Army was discovered with 100% certainty.

The search began in the archives - over 700 hours researching every detail of the York story in the German and American archives. This proved crucial and put my group in the general area of where York earned the Medal of Honor. In fact – there is only one possible 100-meter area in the entire Argonne Forest where this event could have happened. It was in this area that we began nearly 1,000 man-hours of physical searching for evidence of York’s Medal of Honor.

Each day of investigation uncovered a piece of the York story. The biggest find occurred on Saturday 21 October 2006, when nineteen of the twenty-one .45 Automatic Colt Pistol (ACP) cartridges fired by York were discovered. This was the final piece of the puzzle that was needed to designate the “York spot.” It was here that York fought off a German bayonet attack led by Lieutenant Fritz Endriss and forced the final surrender of the right flank of the 125th Württemberg Landwehr Regiment. The fact that York fired at least 21 Colt .45 ACPs is recorded in the History of the 82nd Division A.E.F., published in 1919, which states; “[York] fired… three complete clips from his automatic pistol.” These clips contained seven rounds each. The nineteen recovered .45 cartridges were spread over a ten-foot wide area and were between 2-4 inches deep in the Argonne earth. A few days later, we recovered the twentieth and twenty-first cartridges (#20 in front of the mayors of Châtel Chéhéry and Fléville). The bottom line, the search for the York spot is over.

Although finding the .45 finds was the “piece de résistance,” we also unearthed thousands of other pieces of evidence that tell the York story. These include American 30.06 shell casings, 250 German machine gun shell casings, 100 live German rifle rounds - most in five round clips, several Württemberg and Prussian buttons, 25 German equipment buttons / loops, pieces of German belts / web-gear and evidence of a German battalion HQ building.

The evidence is overwhelming. The battlefield archeology and the German and American first hand sources confirm that York did what he was awarded the Medal of Honor for. This will silence the revisionists and perpetuate the York legacy for another generation. In the meantime, we are working closely with the local French officials and the American Battlefield Monuments Commission to create a historic trail to ensure that what the great Christian Patriot York did is not forgotten or subjected to unwarranted second-guessing in the future.

Finally - in order to pass the test - the York spot must have an affirmative on the following screening criteria - a NO to any of these means that the site is wrong.

*Does it agree with historical facts about German units involved and unit defense locations?

*Is it along the right flank of the German 125 and 120 Regiments?

*Does the terrain match photographs taken in 1919?

*Is it supported by battlefield archeology?

*Is it close to the 1/120 regiment battlefront?

*Is it logical from a tactical military perspective?

*Does it agrees with written German and American testimony?

*Is it located where the machine guns are in the fight - engaging Americans in the valley?

*Is it on terrain that dramatically impacted the outcome of the battle (decisive terrain)?

*Does it agree with the battle progression/sequence as recorded by the 2nd Landwehr Division?

*Is it close to a trench (York's and Vollmer's testimony)?

*Is it near two roads that head east - out of the Argonne?

*Is it close to Vollmer's HQ?

Sadly for the Birdwell / Nolan team – they have a resounding NO on most of the above. However, what we found is an unambiguous/resounding yes to all of these. I am 100% confidant of this as there is little room for error when you measure our hard evidence. This is a slam-dunk. In the end, the search for the York spot is not about Birdwell, or Mastriano. It is about the truth and honoring the legacy of Alvin York. The search for the historically accurate York spot ended in October.

Questions –

The 1919 82nd Infantry Division History states that York fired three complete clips from his Colt .45 for a total of 21 cartridges. Why didn’t Dr. Birdwell find the 21 cartridges, while Mastriano did?

Both the German and American eyewitnesses mention a trench from which German Lieutenant Endriss led a bayonet attack against York. Where is this trench?

What does Dr. Birdwell think about the trench at the location where Mastriano found near the site of the 21 Colt .45 cartridges?

After York captured the 132 German soldiers, the German center/right flank collapsed. The 2nd Landwehr Division’s commander, General Franke, ordered the 122 Landwehr Regiment forward to cover the retreat of the 2nd and 3rd battalion. How does Dr. Birdwell explain that the spot is correct, but York did not capture any 122nd soldiers?

In January 1919, the 82nd Infantry Division conducted an investigation of York’s actions. The photos that were taken of where York earned the Medal of Honor do not match the site. How does Dr. Birdwell explain this?

How can Dr. Birdwell make a 100% claim of certainty when he has not visited the German archives in Potsdam, Stuttgart, Ulm, Munich or Freiburg when these are the only places where one can find vital York related documents
(that has information on where the German units were)?

The majority of the prisoners that York captured came from the 120th, 125th and 210th regiments. The only place where these all served together is 600 meters away on the hill called Humserberg (the center hill) from Dr. Birdwell’s claimed spot. How does he explain this?

Many of the artifacts that Dr. Birdwell is displaying are French light Chauchat machine gun bullets (called the sho-sho by the Americans - the short fat rounds). None of the 16 Americans with York on 8 October 1918 had this weapon. Does this actually disprove Dr. Birdwell’s supposition?


Give or take 600 meters, the site is pretty much found. If these are actually the 21 shell casings from Sgt. York's trusty .45, then those would IMHO trump the button found by Profs. Birdwell and Nolan...


powered by performancing firefox

Tuesday, November 28, 2006

UPDATE 12/16/2006
Today, thousands marched in New York City, on 5th Avenue, lead by wheelchair-bound Trent Benefield (one of the survivors of the Police Shooting of Sean Bell last month.

Bell's fiancee, Nicole Paultre, was also among the marchers, as were U.S. Rep. Anthony Weiner, city transit union president Roger Toussaint and human rights activist Bianca Jagger. The marchers started at 59th Street and finished their protest more than an hour later outside Macy's on 34th Street.

There's been quite a few protests...the Black Panthers, a protest outside of the NYPD Headquarters by The December 12 Movement (that protest included some gang members...what, do they think they can weasel a 'get out of jail free' card by joining in? These protests should be by and for law-abiding citizens, not card-carrying crooks).

This sad event has even spawned a Wiki entry.






Or, I could title this post "We're not anti-police ... we're anti-police brutality." That may be the only thing Al Sharpton ever said that I agree with.

The story? Hypertensive New York undercover cops fire 50 rounds into a car (full of unarmed men leaving a bachleor's party), killing the groom, wounding another man with 11 9mm rounds...then hancuffing him to a hospital bed, all of this done without ever having seen a weapon or filing charges.

It should be easy for civilians to expect cops to be correct before shooting. Maybe one or two rounds were justified (even that, now, seems to be a stretch). But 50 rounds? C'mon, that's what the range is for!

One cop was struck by the evil groom's car (after he walked in front of it...you don't usually walk in front of a car, do you?)
"Three officers, including the officer hit by the car, were treated and released. Another detective remained hospitalized for hypertension..."

Yes, I would be nervous too. The other officer, not hit by the car, or nervous stomach? Since the 'suspects' were unarmed, maybe he got hit by a richochet, or flying glass? Lots of that, when 50 rounds are being sprayed on city streets. Or maybe he saw a 92-year-old woman peering at him and was injured trying to chase and subdue her?

The 'Bride' spoke out yesterday (she never got a chance to get married, so she can't be a widow)
"They were murderers, murderers," she said. "They were not officers. No one gives anyone the right to kill somebody."

New York City Mayor Bloomberg also chimed in:
Mayor Michael Bloomberg tried to soothe an upset community on Monday and said bluntly that officers appeared to use "excessive force" when an unarmed man was killed in a storm of police gunfire outside a strip club hours before his wedding.

"I can tell you that it is to me unacceptable or inexplicable how you can have 50-odd shots fired, but that's up to the investigation to find out what really happened," Bloomberg said.


So where does Barney Fife and his one bullet come in?

The 'new' catchphrase I heard yesterday: "Contagious Shooting". Where if one cop starts shooting, guess what? All start shooting.

That's just great. Roaming Execution Firing Squads on Donuts.

Maybe Andy knew what he was doing when he only gave Barney Fife one bullet...

Saturday, November 11, 2006

I can see it all over the blogospere, the reeling Republicans peering into their navels wondering what and why and how this happened. How could the party of the Right be so wrong?

I found the best answer overseas....

Probably the best one-paragraph summary, and prophecy, that I've read on the post-election.

"It will take time for this to sink in among conservative Republicans. This election has been a major blow to their self-image and world-view. Like the Thatcherites, they got used to assuming that they were always right and would always be victorious. On Tuesday the voters told them they were wrong. It has taken many false starts for the Conservative party to get back in the game in Britain. Something similar could happen to the suddenly weakened Republicans. But there's nothing they like more than a fight."


Republicans will first have to address the errors made in operations and tactics of the Wars, in Iraq, and Afghanistan.
"It was the crash heard round the world. It came in the form of a nationwide protest against the Iraq war and Bush's presidency. A new survey of actual voters, conducted since election day by Bill Clinton's former pollster, Stan Greenberg, confirms that Iraq was by far the most important issue that influenced Americans' votes. The divide among those for whom Iraq was the most important issue went 3:1 in favour of the Democrats. That, in a nutshell, explains what happened."


Then we have to address the philosophy of Conservatism; or, where it was misplaced. The housecleaning has to be swift. Some facts are now painfully obvious: Rummy's bus ticket out of town was punched three weeks too late. Bush is not a conservative. Martin Kettle is wrong when he says Bush is a Conservative, at least in the Reagan mold...
"What happened this week was not complex. It was the crash of the conservative political project begun by Newt Gingrich in 1994 and crystallised under George Bush since 2000."

No, Martin, it was the steady departure from Reagan Conservatism. The 'Neo Conservative' movement is a failure, and should be...sorry, shitcanned.

Bush fought the war in Iraq for the right reasons, but didn't use enough force to finish...just like his dad, he stopped short of enough effort to knock out the opposition. Given all of the sentiment against the warn and Republicans, Bush is a liability. Even Rush Limbaugh is tired of 'carrying his water'. This Republican ship won't stop sinking until George Bush is mending fences in Texas.

And the real winners aren't the Democrats, but the terrorists: Islamic Facists or 'Freedom Fighters', with 'Vendetta' already planned for their next six generations. Terrorists will get a reprieve, time they need to strengthen and rearm, and multiply. Worst case, they will get Iraq, after we cut and run/pull out, with the possibility of Iraqi Oil.

The Conservatives will fight, but first bloodletting should be inside the Republican party. This will take at least two years, for obvious reasons. It may take up to six years: the 2008 Presidential Election loss, then 4 more years of Democrat control of the Government, before the pendulum starts to swing back.

Let's just hope that we don't give the enemy all the time he needs to bring it back over here...

 

FREE HOT BODYPAINTING | HOT GIRL GALERRY