Showing posts with label nobel prize. Show all posts
Showing posts with label nobel prize. Show all posts

Friday, October 8, 2010

Liu Xiaobo should've won this Nobel Peace Prize last year. Instead, in 2009, the Nobel committee beclowned itself, and with it's poor choice awarded the Nobel Peace Prize the status of a Crackerjack box booby prize.

Finally, they do get one right, but the award's worth is now forever questionable.

Liu Xiaobo...the poor guy's stuck in prison in China, serving 11 years, for a lifetime of dissent against the Communists, and likely will never know he's won this award. I'll be his life expectancy is much shortened. The Chinese can't afford to ever let him out, because with this sort of acclaim, he's a much bigger enemy than he ever was...
Blacklisted from academia and barred from publishing in China, Mr. Liu has been harassed and detained repeatedly since 1989, when he stepped into the drama playing out on Tiananmen Square by staging a hunger strike and then negotiating the peaceful retreat of student demonstrators as thousands of soldiers stood by with rifles at the ready.

“If not for the work of Liu and the others to broker a peaceful withdrawal from the square, Tiananmen Square would have been a field of blood on June 4,” said Gao Yu, a veteran journalist who was arrested in the hours before the tanks began moving through the city.

His most recent arrest in December of 2008 came a day before a reformist manifesto he helped craft began circulating on the Internet. The petition, entitled Charter ‘08, demanded that China’s rulers embrace human rights, judicial independence and the kind of political reform that would ultimately end the Communist Party’s monopoly on power.

“For all these years, Liu Xiaobo has persevered in telling the truth about China and because of this, for the fourth time, he has lost his personal freedom,” his wife, Liu Xia, said earlier this week.

Given his detention, it is unclear how Mr. Liu would take possession of the prize, which includes a gold medal, a diploma and the equivalent of $1.46 million.
He was in prison last year, when you gave this prize to Obama, you Nobel Nincompoops.

Maybe that should be a prerequisite for giving a Nobel Peace Prize, that the recipient be in jail, or served time in jail. They would've had to wait a while to give it to BHO.

China, the brutal regime who makes the USA 'solvent', is not amused. The Chinese power cabal is 'furious'...
"Liu Xiaobo is a criminal who has been sentenced by Chinese judicial departments for violating Chinese law," the foreign ministry said in a statement.

Awarding the peace prize to Liu "runs completely counter to the principle of the prize and is also a blasphemy to the peace prize", the statement said.
"...blasphemy to the peace prize" ? Where were you last year?

Screw the Chinese. They've become an economic and world superpower by manufacturing with ultra-cheap labor and selling the USA their morally ugly goods.

China's one-child policy gives them ample cash supplies, that they then use to buy our worthless paper debt-bonds to keep our own dirty socialists happy and in power. The Chinese money they use to finance our debt is the direct result of China's policy of mass eugenics. China has a one-child-per-family mandate, selective childbirth, one-child only, with forced abortions, to the tune of 11,000,000 abortions per year. That's a lot of blood running to keep the USA cheaply clothed and trinketed.

Loves us some Chinese, we Americans; instead of being the self-sufficient superpower we once were, we are beholden to a bloody regime of Communists, a superpower because we made them one, a superpower that force-kills their own children, a superpower that just so happens to holds this dissident Liu Xiaobo in jail. For that they get the spotlight of the once-bright Nobel Peace Prize, that's now operating at quarter-wattage at best.

Yes, this Nobel Peace Prize award is 365 days late, and a few trillion dollars and 11 million lives short. Thanks, Nobel Committee, you evil-clown fucks.

Thursday, December 10, 2009

Former UN Ambassador John Bolton analyzes BHO's Nobel 'Peace' Prize acceptance speech... "amazing misconceptions..." "turgid..." "repetitive..." "high school level..." "no lead in his pencil..." (!) Watch the video. The link is to the full text of the speech.




Embarrassing, BHO, simply embarrassing.

BHO: "...we will not eradicate violent conflict in our lifetime..." No shit, Sherlock. But if you apologize enough for America, keep promoting your global leftist attitudes and narratives and, as Democrats are wont to do, continue to weaken our military under your watch (call it "yet another 'peace dividend!'") then you will set us up for more devastating surprise attacks. Lather, rinse, repeat.

Obama would've been better off just to bow in the general direction of Oslo (he could've used a prayer rug and really gotten down low) then sent the Hillary Bug to collect his prize. Or, better, send that little twerp, the embattled Schools Czar Kevin Jennings, over there with a 'fisting kit' (can you believe that story? maybe somehow it ties in to and explains Obama's bows ? ...)

Next, Obama shuffles off to Dopenhagen, where he'll perform even more amazingly stupid and mind-boggling hard-leftist pet tricks; this time, to advocate the continued destruction of the free marketplace! Just sign here on the dotted line...A surefire and faster way to enable the U.S.'s decline!

Hmmmph. I hope it snows seventy feet over there. With AlGore in attendence, it just might.


h/t Pamela Geller, Atlas Shrugs


Right this minute (close enough) Barack Obama is sneaking into Norway, snagging his unearned Nobel Peace Prize, pocketing the awards check, and getting the hell out of town (so fast that he's pissed off the King of Norway and every journalist in that diminutive and otherwise unimportant country; that the snub is real is noted in various news articles written all over the globe, including this one written in the previously-snubbed United Kingdom, who by now must be used to BHO's well-documented insensitivity to the  U.S.'s allies).

Various bloggers have posted articles on whether or not BHO is intentionally slighting and snubbing these pitiful Norwegians. Not so fast I say; I think BHO is simply embarrassed.

How can that be, you ask? How can this man, O!ne who lives for the aura of grandeur and pomposity and belts out those oh-so fantastical speeches (thanks, TOTUS!) ever be beset with even a hint of embarrassment? Are you sure he's embarrassed, or, as Dan Rhiel opines, he simply hates white people?

There may be something to that (or even more than a little something), but I'm thinking that when only 1 in 5 of your own countrymen (a CNN poll fer chrissake) think you deserve the prize, well, yes, simple embarrassment can creep in to even the most arrogant man in the United States. Fleeting as it may be, it's still quite possible.

So, Barack Hussein Obama, pick up your crackerjack prize and scuttle off to Copenhagen. There you will find some cheering crowds of 'scientists' and journalists you can speak to, their mindless polishing will salve your wounded ego. Ship that hunk of worthless metal back to the U.S.A. via UPS Ground; stash it in the White House basement.

Oh, and the check? Why not apply that to the National Debt you're now responsible for? It's not much, but since it's unearned (and possibly illegal) money, it'll be the thought that counts.

Saturday, November 7, 2009



Seen at and stolen from The Green Room.

Thursday, October 15, 2009

Because the U.S. Constitution forbids you to accept it.
Article I, Section 9, of the Constitution, the emolument clause, clearly stipulates: "And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince or foreign State."

The award of the peace prize to a sitting president is not unprecedented. But Theodore Roosevelt and Woodrow Wilson received the honor for their past actions: Roosevelt's efforts to end the Russo-Japanese War, and Wilson's work in establishing the League of Nations. Obama's award is different. It is intended to affect future action. As a member of the Nobel Committee explained, the prize should encourage Obama to meet his goal of nuclear disarmament. It raises important legal questions for the second time in less than 10 months -- questions not discussed, much less adequately addressed anywhere else.

The five-member Nobel commission is elected by the Storting, the parliament of Norway. Thus the award of the peace prize is made by a body representing the legislature of a sovereign foreign state. There is no doubt that the Nobel Peace Prize is an "emolument" ("gain from employment or position," according to Webster).[emboldening mine -ed.]
So, giving BHO an award for deeds he hasn't yet committed does seem to be a yoke around his neck, a controlling influence, a preemptive feint within a feint within a feint; a (as I've said before) trap designed to snare a monstrously inflated ego. "I'll have my bauble, and eat it too!"

So, Mr. President, Mr. Harvard Law Professor what edited the Harvard Law Review, please to pick up the Constitution and read it for yourself. Spend some time studying the thing, and not with an eye as to how to change it to suit your far-Lefty Progressive desires. Study it as a limiting framework designed to curb your (and any elected official's) tendency to overreach, because that's exactly the intent that the founders wrote in to it; to limit the powers of the people who are elected to serve as our nation's representatives, and to delineate the framework under which they (and you) can accept barely-concealed bribes.

Oh, and remember, your Oath of Office? That's really binding, you know.

h/t Liz Blaine


Sunday, October 11, 2009

Why do we Conservatives laugh at Obama's Nobel? Dan Riehl of Riehl World View answers succinctly...




Saturday, October 10, 2009




Posted by Darleen Click @ PW.

There she linked this Times Online UK article written by pundit Michael Binyon...
Comment: absurd decision on Obama makes a mockery of the Nobel peace prize
Well, no, Michael, the Nobel Peace Prize for 1994 was awarded to Yassar (Blow up the JOOOOOOOOS!) Arafat; with that, the shark was jumped.

OH, the DCCC is desirous to have you send an congratulatory message to BHO for his puzzling win. I did! Thrice!

"Nice Job, Mr. Arafat!
oh, wait..."

"Does this mean you'll denounce and apologize for America with even greater vehemence, since you now owe these progressive 'tards your future credibility?"

"No, really, I want to offer my sincere Congratulations! To the Norwegians.

You're caught in a progressive trap; forced to further your already destructive leftist agenda to the detriment of America. Your ego makes you grab onto the prize and never let go, no matter what damage might result to our nation.

It's a trap much like that what uses a banana in a jar..."

Friday, October 9, 2009

Enough concern about an imaginary 'butthurt'. Let's have some good, clean fun!

(Bet you can't beat my caption)...


(click for the original, and to embiggen)

The Original Concraption...
Chairman of the Norwegian Nobel Committee, Thorbjoern Jagland, holds a picture of US President Barack Obama, in Oslo, Norway, Friday, Oct. 9, 2009, after the announcement of Obama as winner of the 2009 Nobel Peace Prize. The citation for the award, in part says, The Norwegian Nobel Committee has decided that the Nobel Peace Prize for 2009 is to be awarded to President Barack Obama for his extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between peoples. The Committee has attached special importance to Obama's vision of and work for a world without nuclear weapons.
Enjoy!

(photoshop)



Saturday, August 22, 2009



Seriously. The Herr Doktor won an 'Ignobel Award' for his troubles. And possibly a position as one of Obama's Crackpot Czars, of the probative sort : "Wee-Weed Outtakes" Czar. Or something.

If you have a better caption, tell me.

h/t @thebcast

Wednesday, June 10, 2009

Charles Krauthammer won the 11th Annual 2009 Eric Breindel Award for Excellence in Opinion Journalism; his acceptance speech yesterday included remarks lauding Fox News...

AT a time when awards in the humanities are a near-monopoly of the left -- Nobel peace prizes awarded to those, from Yasir Arafat to Jimmy Carter, who give the most succor to the forces of terror and tyranny; Pulitzers given to whichever newspaper can expose the more damaging national-security secrets -- it is important for there to be an award to recognize and encourage journalism and, more generally, political thinking of a different kind.

In that respect, there should be a special award for Fox News. Fox has done a great service to the American polity -- singlehandedly breaking up the intellectual and ideological monopoly that for decades exerted hegemony (to use a favorite lefty cliché) over the broadcast media.

...

The reason Fox News has thrived and grown is because it offers a vibrant and honest alternative to those who could not abide yet another day of the news delivered to them beneath layer after layer of often undisguised liberalism.
Did I mention that Charles Krauthammer is quickly becoming my favorite pundit? I thought so.

Tuesday, August 5, 2008


~*~


This comment is my favorite...
"One thing I recall from “Gulag” is a commentary Solzhenitsyn made how the stooges that ran the Gulags were totally befuddled by true Christian believers who didn’t fear death. They, like all totalitarians realized the limit and transitory nature of their power; their inability to conquer the human spirit. Solzhenitsyn’s effort to preserve on scraps of paper that terrible history stands forever to shame the Marxist toadies [in] western universities who have tried to hold up that rotten stinking hellish system as something noble. RIP to a great man."
Since I'm on vacation, that's all I've got.

Tuesday, April 22, 2008


"It will be difficult for people to face the truth when their reputations, careers, government grants or hopes for social change depend on global warming, but the fate of civilization may be at stake.

"In the famous words of Oliver Cromwell, "I beseech you, in the bowels of Christ, think it possible you may be mistaken."

"Phil Chapman is a geophysicist and astronautical engineer who lives in San Francisco. He was the first Australian to become a NASA astronaut."
So, what is this must-be-fraudulent (or so will say every "the debate is OVER!" Goreacle-religioner fruitcake warmalist) scientist talking about? Why, an impending little ice age, "similar to the one that lasted from 1100 to 1850". No way, you say, when most all scientists are on the Global Warmalism bandwagon! Why is anyone even allowed to speak otherwise?

Well, there is some new, inconvenient data...
"All four agencies that track Earth's temperature (the Hadley Climate Research Unit in Britain, the NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies in New York, the Christy group at the University of Alabama, and Remote Sensing Systems Inc in California) report that it cooled by about 0.7C in 2007. This is the fastest temperature change in the instrumental record and it puts us back where we were in 1930. If the temperature does not soon recover, we will have to conclude that global warming is over.

"There is also plenty of anecdotal evidence that 2007 was exceptionally cold. It snowed in Baghdad for the first time in centuries, the winter in China was simply terrible and the extent of Antarctic sea ice in the austral winter was the greatest on record since James Cook discovered the place in 1770.

"It is generally not possible to draw conclusions about climatic trends from events in a single year, so I would normally dismiss this cold snap as transient, pending what happens in the next few years."
You would be wise to do so, if you value your career and hope to get a nice invitation to Gore's manse or to one of those splendid parties thrown by the True Believers. Surely, you have more than just those inconvenient data? Hmmm? Alarmism such as yours could never be accepted by any scientist or the community; after that embarrassing thing in the '70's...
"THE scariest photo I have seen on the internet is www.spaceweather.com, where you will find a real-time image of the sun from the Solar and Heliospheric Observatory, located in deep space at the equilibrium point between solar and terrestrial gravity.

What is scary about the picture is that there is only one tiny sunspot.
Should there be more than one?
"This is where SOHO comes in. The sunspot number follows a cycle of somewhat variable length, averaging 11 years. The most recent minimum was in March last year. The new cycle, No.24, was supposed to start soon after that, with a gradual build-up in sunspot numbers.

"It didn't happen. The first sunspot appeared in January this year and lasted only two days. A tiny spot appeared last Monday but vanished within 24 hours. Another little spot appeared this Monday. Pray that there will be many more, and soon.

"The reason this matters is that there is a close correlation between variations in the sunspot cycle and Earth's climate. The previous time a cycle was delayed like this was in the Dalton Minimum, an especially cold period that lasted several decades from 1790.

"Northern winters became ferocious: in particular, the rout of Napoleon's Grand Army during the retreat from Moscow in 1812 was at least partly due to the lack of sunspots.

"That the rapid temperature decline in 2007 coincided with the failure of cycle No.24 to begin on schedule is not proof of a causal connection but it is cause for concern."
Concern? You mean, Sunspot Credits? Should we purchase those before it's too late?
It is time to put aside the global warming dogma, at least to begin contingency planning about what to do if we are moving into another little ice age, similar to the one that lasted from 1100 to 1850.

There is no doubt that the next little ice age would be much worse than the previous one and much more harmful than anything warming may do. There are many more people now and we have become dependent on a few temperate agricultural areas, especially in the US and Canada. Global warming would increase agricultural output, but global cooling will decrease it.

Millions will starve if we do nothing to prepare for it (such as planning changes in agriculture to compensate), and millions more will die from cold-related diseases.

There is also another possibility, remote but much more serious. The Greenland and Antarctic ice cores and other evidence show that for the past several million years, severe glaciation has almost always afflicted our planet.

The bleak truth is that, under normal conditions, most of North America and Europe are buried under about 1.5km of ice. This bitterly frigid climate is interrupted occasionally by brief warm interglacials, typically lasting less than 10,000 years.

The interglacial we have enjoyed throughout recorded human history, called the Holocene, began 11,000 years ago, so the ice is overdue. We also know that glaciation can occur quickly: the required decline in global temperature is about 12C and it can happen in 20 years.

The next descent into an ice age is inevitable but may not happen for another 1000 years. On the other hand, it must be noted that the cooling in 2007 was even faster than in typical glacial transitions. If it continued for 20 years, the temperature would be 14C cooler in 2027.
Well, I'm inclined to dismiss this as probable bullshite. Since we've been burned by 'Global Warming', and that other Embarrassing Thing from the '70's. And, Al Gore (who was/is lying? Who Knew?). We should, you know, wait for some more data.

Unless, of course, we can persuade a failed politician to get on board and push for social change, maybe promote him/herself a Nobel Peace Prize or something. Form a new(er) religion, based on the imminent icing of the planet.

Maybe whoever loses this Democratic primary. That person will not be very happy, and will need a new role, a payback-sort of thing. Because he/she is grudgy.

Then, get some Hollywierd types onboard. And a theme song, for the inevitable global concert.

For now, this placekeeper dude, until we see who steps forward as...

The New, Inconvenient Truthiness IceCycler!

;D


h/t Ace

Monday, December 31, 2007

I can't do a 2007 Year in Review, after reading dAVe barry's syndicated column here. He's hit every high and low with teh funny. Just a sample...

"It was a year that strode boldly into the stall of human events and took a wide stance astride the porcelain bowl of history.

In short, 2007 was a year of deep gloom, pierced occasionally by rays of even deeper gloom. And as is so often true of bad years, it began with ...

January

... when Democrats, having won the November elections, take control of both houses of Congress with surprisingly little loss of life.

Upon taking power, the Democrats, who campaigned vigorously against the war in Iraq, and who hailed their victory as a clear voter mandate to get the troops out of Iraq, immediately get down to the business of being careful to not do anything that might actually result in the removal of troops from Iraq, in case that might turn out to be a bad idea. This is fine with President Bush, who calls for a "troop surge," based on his understanding of the comprehensive Iraq Study Group Report, as interpreted for him by aides equipped with 20,000 G.I. Joe action figures.

As the debate over Iraq intensifies, the eyes of a worried nation turn to another trouble spot: New York City, where Donald Trump and Rosie O'Donnell are locked in a bitter high-stakes battle to determine who is the bigger horse's ass.

In sports, a Los Angeles team signs glamorous British soccer star David Beckham to a $250 million contract. This raises eyebrows, both because of the amount of money and because the team is the Dodgers. But Beckham's glamorous presence quickly boosts ticket sales; within days the Lakers sign Angelina Jolie.

Sports remains in the news in ...

February..."
That's world-class tease, folks.

My own little look-back will be spartan, comparatively speaking. Since I'm into imagery, I'll just dump my favorite item from each month's posts, not exactly tying into dAVe barry's outline, but close enough.

January (Saddam was still on my mind)



February (Premature Infant...Abortion really sucks)


~*~


March "I closed my eyes, and it slipped away..." Brad Delp, RIP



April Nappy-headed jackass, indeed.



May Paris, in Jail. Lovin' every minute...


aimez le modèle, Paris~!



May McNair, Pacman, Vick...with their weaknesses exposed.



June We lost one of my favorite bloggers, Barking Moonbat Early Warning System's Skipper. His knowing post...
Allan C. Kelly
1949-2007
R.I.P.


In one of the Skipper's final posts, he described his pending back surgery, and left these thoughts:
"Meanwhile, while you slept a few thousand more Mexicans crossed the border last night, Wal-Mart built six more stores somewhere, the trade deficit with China increased by a few billion dollars, the North Koreans and Iranians came up with seventeen more plans to prove they are barking mad and several thousand more non-Muslims were murdered in Darfur by followers of the Prophet For Profit.

"Then again, you already know all this and just need a place to get together and figure out what we’re all going to do when the roof caves in - and make no mistake, the rafters are crumbling. Depressing? Sure, but what are we going to do?

"We can start to fix our government eighteen months from now in the 2008 elections. The interim is going to be dicey as somebody out there decided in the last election to install a whole bunch of really crazy people in the Congress and Senate. That was not my fault, by the way - and neither was it George Bush’s fault.

"As for the rest of the sitrep, we can wall ourselves off from the rest of the world and experiment with isolationism again or we can continue to muddle our way through the minefield of international relations - and that is where the problem comes in. We’re just no damn good at realpolitik. Not this administration, the whole country has never been real good at the devious games diplomats play. We haven’t been at this game long enough to understand all the rules.

"All I can really tell you is (a) keep a firm grasp of right and wrong, (b) stay involved in government and watch the bastards in Washignton every minute, (c) use every legal means to make sure you can defend yourself in the event of real internal trouble, and (d) keep talking to each other, whether here or elsewhere."

Damn, he was succinct, and unnervingly right on the money. And that last paragraph is....knowing.


July Scott Beauchamp, liar, gets nailed to the wall by Jeff Goldstein. (Click on the pic for the links)



August Michael Vick... "Yonder goes a man with a dog collar on, think we ought to throw old Spike a bone? Hey, Spike! whadda you like!"



September Iran's Blood Fountain, Black Friday...click the image for the background info.

Black Friday Blood Fountain

October The Nobel Peace Prize Jumps the Shark (again...)



Novmeber Lame Hollywood Movie Leaves Hollywood Limp...


December Hey, I made the paper!



That's a wrap. I've got much to do.

See you next year!

Wednesday, November 7, 2007

Who DARES challenge lofty lefty Gore the Great on his particularly self-serving 'invention' of man-made, said to be eventually catastrophic Climate Change (a concept that's spread like wildfire amongst simple-minded leftists who, incidentally, also believe that George Bush and Dick Cheney purchased insurance on the Twin Towers just before their attack, so they could get richer)? Why, the inventor of the Weather Channel, a lifelong meteorologist, one with impeccable credentials (at least until the GoreAttackBots get on his history..) . John's been on TV since 1953, created the Weather channel, and is still giving up weather forecasts in San Diego. And writing essays, such as this one published on Icecap (an aggregator for Climate and Climate Science, sans politics, and hopefully immune to what's going to be political pressure and vitriol from the leftists who believe in Global Warming.)

On to Mr. Coleman...

"It is the greatest scam in history. I am amazed, appalled and highly offended by it. Global Warming; It is a SCAM. Some dastardly scientists with environmental and political motives manipulated long term scientific data to create in allusion of rapid global warming. Other scientists of the same environmental whacko type jumped into the circle to support and broaden the “research” to further enhance the totally slanted, bogus global warming claims. Their friends in government steered huge research grants their way to keep the movement going. Soon they claimed to be a consensus.

"Environmental extremists, notable politicians among them, then teamed up with movie, media and other liberal, environmentalist journalists to create this wild “scientific” scenario of the civilization threatening environmental consequences from Global Warming unless we adhere to their radical agenda. Now their ridiculous manipulated science has been accepted as fact and become a cornerstone issue for CNN, CBS, NBC, the Democratic Political Party, the Governor of California, school teachers and, in many cases, well informed but very gullible environmental conscientious citizens. Only one reporter at ABC has been allowed to counter the Global Warming frenzy with one 15 minutes documentary segment.

"I do not oppose environmentalism. I do not oppose the political positions of either party. However, Global Warming, ie Climate Change, is not about environmentalism or politics. It is not a religion. It is not something you “believe in.” It is science; the science of meteorology. This is my field of life-long expertise. And I am telling you Global Warming is a non-event, a manufactured crisis and a total scam."


Well, there you go, a direct attack on Gore's wishes. I hope Mr. Coleman is prepared for some backlash, unfortunately. You just don't challenge a Nobel Prize Winner and come off unscathed. The nerve of this guy! To actually want to see some real science, not just the hyperbole we're expected to accept without challenge, the failed and beaten politician's ticket back to the limelight.
The rest from Mr Coleman...
"I have read dozens of scientific papers. I have talked with numerous scientists. I have studied. I have thought about it. I know I am correct. There is no run away climate change. The impact of humans on climate is not catastrophic. Our planet is not in peril. I am incensed by the incredible media glamour, the politically correct silliness and rude dismissal of counter arguments by the high priest of Global Warming.

"In time, a decade or two, the outrageous scam will be obvious. As the temperature rises, polar ice cap melting, coastal flooding and super storm pattern all fail to occur as predicted everyone will come to realize we have been duped. The sky is not falling. And, natural cycles and drifts in climate are as much if not more responsible for any climate changes underway. I strongly believe that the next twenty years are equally as likely to see a cooling trend as they are to see a warming trend."
I would just like to hear a healthy debate among real scientists, unimpeded by political expediencies that we've witnessed to date. There's just not enough evidence that humans are changing the weather (we are overpopulating the planet, but that's nothing Mother Nature won't handle soon enough). Stop ignoring and pooh-poohing the sun's output, the effect of which is visible on Mars' shrinking icecaps (where humans haven't managed to run SUV's overmuch, just yet) and realize that cyclic weather patterns are the norm. We're on a planet circling a thermonuclear furnace, for chrissakes, and the thing is a bit variable. The sun is not a constant, folks, it's a star, and stars aren't exactly stable. We have solar flares, sunspots (solar storms), and most people alive today haven't circled the thing over 40 times. Modern science is just now getting a good snapshot of what might be a normative time; more likely, we're seeing a warming phase of the sun. Guess what? We're downstream, and things will be affected.

Just like they've been affected before, and will be affected again. Unfortunately, we probably won't live long enough to see the ice age that will follow this cycle, but believe me, it's going to happen.

We should enjoy this phase while we can...

Tuesday, October 23, 2007

2007 just wasn't a very good year for the Nobel committees. 

Al Gore takes the 'Peace' Prize for his "Earth Under Fire" Global Warming scare tactics,  falsely blaming mankind for Global Climate Change, and stifling any true debate.  Al is sharing his Nobel Prize with the IPCC (an agency that's not even comprised of all scientists...the IPCC is a Inter-Governmental agency that includes activist groups like Greenpeace).  Al Gore is scaring kids and convincing the easily-convinced and desirious of calamity (as long as it hampers and threatens existing economies) progressives and liberals.  Scientists who dissent from the 'Politically Correct' debate 'conclusions' are threatened. Just watch this video, where John Stossel dares to challenge the Goreacle.

Good for him! Scientists shouldn't be silenced to satisfy a fat loser...

Another Nobel 2007 recipient, Doris Lessing, says from her birdcage that the Islamofacist attack on the Twin Towers on 9/11 "wasn't all that bad". The old dear (she's 88, bless her leftist heart) compared an IRA bombing that killed 5 people to the devastation that was brought to Manhattan...

"Some Americans will think I'm crazy... but it was neither as terrible or as extraordinary as they think..." "They're a very naive people, or they pretend to be," she added of Americans.

Lessing, whose novels include The Golden Notebook and Memoirs of a Survivor, also branded President George W Bush "a world calamity". "Everyone is tired of this man. Either he is stupid or he is very clever, although you have to remember he is a member of a social class which has profited from wars." The writer also said that she "always hated Tony Blair from the beginning".

Doris has a history of far leftist views...this quote from a website lost in Global Warming krazy...
Doris Lessing, to the people who know of her work, is mainly known for being a feminist author of the 1950s and 60s, who often wrote about her experiences growing up in Southern Africa as the daughter of British colonialist farmers. For years, she was also a very strident and vocal Communist.

Fits in well with what the Nobel committees are looking for, now. "Powered-down" societies, indeed. If you want to read a book that's post-disaster, without the commie-lib-progressive takes on your way of life, read Larry Niven's Lucifer' Hammer.

 

Doris Lessing is just another leftist windbag liberal promoted by the partisan Nobel organization to a high enough perch...from which she just fell. Taking some of that golden sheen off the Nobel organization on her way down....


Video h/t BMEWS

Wednesday, October 17, 2007

We've crossed into the latest and bestest ever Political Correctness ControversyTM.


It seems Dr. James Watson, celebrated Molecular Biologist who, along with Dr. Francis Crick, helped to unravel the cell's nucleus and shared in the discovery of DNA, who received a share of the Nobel Prize in 1962 for advancing Medicine (NOT the 'Peace' prize, btw; that went to another Molecular Biologist, Dr. Linus Pauling, for his opposition to above-ground nuclear testing) has effectively shat in a punchbowl. In a room seemingly filled with Diplomats and Kings, extraordinary Gentlemen and Ladies, courtiers and courtesans, he's dropped trou and filled 'er up.

Fury at DNA pioneer's theory: Africans are less intelligent than Westerners

Celebrated scientist attacked for race comments: "All our social policies are based on the fact that their intelligence is the same as ours - whereas all the testing says not really"

Well, this is devastating news. Dr. Watson has always had some problems with flapping his gums at inopportune moments, and now he's really gotten the attention of every race-baiter and political correctness hound imaginable. I expect this to blow way out of proportion over the next few days. Just look at this...
"The newly formed Equality and Human Rights Commission, successor to the Commission for Racial Equality, said it was studying Dr Watson's remarks " in full".
and
"Anti-racism campaigners called for Dr Watson's remarks to be looked at in the context of racial hatred laws. A spokesman for the 1990 Trust, a black human rights group, said: "It is astonishing that a man of such distinction should make comments that seem to perpetuate racism in this way. It amounts to fuelling bigotry and we would like it to be looked at for grounds of legal complaint."
I find this sentence most telling...
"To many in the scientific community, Watson has long been something of a wild man, and his colleagues tend to hold their collective breath whenever he veers from the script."

Written in 1990, at the dawn of the Political Correctness movement.

Yes, following The Script is now much more important than seeking or reporting any new science. Dr. Watson (for whom I have great respect) unfortunately veered, again, and like many others before him who strayed, will now suffer the damnation from the Keepers of The Script.

It’s fascinating that it seems to even consider a possibility of defending Dr. Watson is, in itself, as heinous an act as the original ‘offense’.

We should, I suppose, just shut down the biological sciences. There’s too much chance that opposing ideologies will grasp at partially-understood research and wring out eugenics, or sociobiology, or…racial biobigotry. Paul Feyerabend suggested in 1970 that a world without science “would be more pleasant than the world we live in today.”

And while we’re at it, let’s shut down the physical sciences as well! Who needs split atoms, or fused ones for that matter? Wouldn’t we all be better off without all this technology? Al, you win; shut down everything. We just needs Mother Earth to take care of us.

Nevermind that 99.9% of all evolutionary paths to date have led directly to extinction. Natural selection isn’t easily trifled with.

But ‘The Script’ should take care of that...right?

All That Said, likely Dr. Watson is full of whatever it is he left in that punchbowl. Shame that he allowed his 79-year-old mouth to run before he thought things through.

Past eras, and all that...


H/T Dan Collins, PW Pub

Friday, October 12, 2007

Shark Jumping at it's finest.





Cross posted to the PW Pub

 

FREE HOT BODYPAINTING | HOT GIRL GALERRY