Showing posts with label Janet Napolitano. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Janet Napolitano. Show all posts

Saturday, November 20, 2010



Mick Jagger approved.

h/t the notion of the Gadsen - Junk mixup to Dan Collins, who asks, "Would you allow Mary Katherine Ham to touch your junk?"




Why, sure! But not whilst standing in line to board a sealed, airtight aluminum cylinder. Can't we find a bunk?

Just don't fly. It's that simple, Americans! Starve the junk-fondling beast, TSA. If we stop flying, the airports will opt to bring in private security, booting out Janet Renapolitano's thugs. We shrink government AND boost the private sector; what's wrong with that?

John Galt doesn't fly American anymore.

UPDATE: Colorized. Which is better ?

Tuesday, November 16, 2010

John Pistole, Janet Napolitano's right-hand 'man' in charge of the TSA, has submitted to a full-body scan and released the image to me. Says Pistole...'There's nothing wrong with this new backscatter scan. As you can see, it's somewhat flattering; we'll start selling these to our customers as an option after they pass through my airports, much like some high-speed roller coaster operators do. It'll help defray the costs of prosecuting non-compliant sorts like this San Deigo terrorist John Tyner, likely.'



Here's John Pistole's newly-released full body scan.


When I asked Janet Napolitano to send me her full-body scan, she declined, saying 'Oh, that's just for the little people. We high-level sorts will never need to go through those dangerous machines. Rules are for you, tiny person, not for me.'

She hadn't seen John Pistole's scan at the time, obviously.


Monday, November 15, 2010


Over the top. The TSA, as commanded by Janet Reno Janet Napolitano, has gone too damned far. There's a palpable resistance forming against the groping and harassing and just plain un-American scanning and grab-assery these thugs are conducting at airports today. This report from San Deigo...
A male agent (it was a female who had directed me to the backscatter machine in the first place), came and waited for me to get my bags and then directed me over to the far corner of the area for screening. After setting my things on a table, he turned to me and began to explain that he was going to do a "standard" pat down. (I thought to myself, "great, not one of those gropings like I've been reading about".) After he described, the pat down, I realized that he intended to touch my groin. After he finished his description but before he started the pat down, I looked him straight in the eye and said, "if you touch my junk, I'll have you arrested." He, a bit taken aback, informed me that he would have to involve his supervisor because of my comment.
Read the rest of that entry, that has amassed 2500 plus comments as of this morning.

Other sites:

Reddit's newly-themed TSA Watchdog page: Operation GrabAss, where we find
TSA agent says to backscatter operator, "Heads up, got a cutie for you!"

Mother provides her account of TSA sexual assault

Full Frontal Nudity Doesn’t Make Us Safer: Abolish the TSA - Art Carden - The Economic Imagination - Forbes
We Won't Fly dot com.
...
The Plan is Simple

1. If you absolutely, positively must fly, opt out of the scanners. Do it to protect your health and privacy.
2. If you can avoid flying, don’t fly. Hit the airlines in the pocketbook until the scanners and gropers are gone. Make the airlines work for us.
3. Raise holy hell. Register your disapproval of the scanners and gropers to your airline, your hotel and all government officials who claim to work for you. Educate your community.
Let's make this as noisy as possible, shall we? Because Janet Napolitano, and her controller Obama, are just damned wrong and stupid to subject Americans to this nonsense when who we are looking for is obvious, but protected by our own political correctness. We are looking for young Muslim men ages 17-40, period. Anyone else is likely exempt.

So, make your voice heard. Stop this madness, stop the Napolitano - Obama thugs in the TSA.

Thursday, April 29, 2010


Tough choices. You leave your impoverished but beloved homeland to come to the United States, where you have an opportunity to work harder than many of the overly-privileged US citizens want to work, for less money than those citizens will get out of bed and turn off the TV for. All is fine until the jobs dry up, and those US citizens who didn't want work suddenly do. Oh, and the cross-border drug runners mess up the good thing: they bring unwanted crime, murder and mahem, drug lord despotism. And the migrating hordes despoil the terrain. Oh, and don't forget the Aztlan, MEChA and LaRaza movements, groups desirous of reconquista...
1) We are Chicanas and Chicanos of Aztlán reclaiming the land of our birth (Chicana/Chicano Nation);

2) Aztlán belongs to indigenous people, who are sovereign and not subject to a foreign culture;

3) We are a union of free pueblos forming a bronze (Chicana/Chicano) Nation;

4) Chicano nationalism, as the key to mobilization and organization, is the common denominator to bring consensus to the Chicana/Chicano Movement;

5) Cultural values strengthen our identity as La Familia de La Raza; and

6) EPA, as a basic plan of Chicana/Chicano liberation, sought the formation of an independent national political party that would represent the sentiments of the Chicana/Chicano community.
Now, the Hispanic community is galvanized by Arizona's daring move to usurp the power of the Obama administration, Governor Jan Brewer was forced to sign the bill into law because Obama and his DHS chief, Janet Napolitano, have had ample opportunities to defend the borders of the very state where Napolitano was once governor, but no! there were other pressing issues that came first: healthcare, climate change &c. Defending the borders of this county, hah! What, do you think that's in the constitution or something? Meanwhile, Phoenix became the Kidnapping Capitol of the United States.

Democrats and leftists are seizing this opportunity to decry Governor Jan Brewer's desire for law and order. San Francisco, the "Sanctuary City" that isn't, is calling for a boycott. They also smell votes, these Democrats; the illegal aliens, if given the vote, will naturally vote Social Democrat. Not that they are moochers, hell no, and I'll bet most Hispanics aren't default criminals, but you know the stick-carrot routine. The moocher - looter attractant scent is the natural lure for our modern far-left Democrats.

May 1, May Day, is a worldwide socialist holiday. Naturally, these sorts will join with the inflamed aliens and all will come out to protest and demand; you'll see Mexico's flags, but not Mexico's stringent laws. 

Obama has a golden opportunity to run with whatever he can get using Rham's Corollary. I remind you that we are facing a foe skilled in the Alinsky methodologies, and Rule #8 is “Keep the pressure on. Never let up.” Which means, if it seems we’re getting traction with laser-like focus on, say, financial issues, then the focus will change; because of Rule #7 “A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag.”. It takes only a news headline to defocus to another, foe-friendlier, topic; using the Rham Corollary “Never let a serious crisis go to waste.” A good right-now example is this passage of Arizona's illegal roundup law. We see Global Warmalism (a weakening issue for Obama) tabled and his next moocher-vote-attractor “Immigration Reform” come to the forefront.

At best, we'll get reform. Democrats will get more voters. At worst, we lose ground.



Thursday, December 31, 2009










Happy New Year! I'm gonna PARTAY!

Wednesday, December 30, 2009


This, seen at protein wisdom, is illustrative of Games Presidents Play and the Consequences of Poor Choices. Darleen Click...
To expand, I suspect that Barack Obama, child of privilege and born “black” into a left-dominated culture that fetishized him, grew up feeling entitled to his good fortune, regardless of real effort. His whole life he has had people scrambling to do for him, to see him as “the first black [fill in]” so as to be able to say to themselves “see what I did? I helped achieve this so I’m proving I’m not racist.”

Obama wanted healthcare “reform” but handed it off to Pelosi and Reid. Indeed, he bristled at any dissent, so much so, he cut off communication with Republicans on the issue last March. “I Won” Obama feels entitled to unquestioned deference — along with media facetime on his terms and whims. Just let him eat his waffle or make his tee time.
Abdulmutallab shouldn't have assumed a seat on any commercial flight, especially one bound for Detroit from Amsterdam, given the warning signs he had displayed. We knew this kid was trouble. Wheels didn't turn; people didn't act. Top Management must pay for this.

Janet Reno Napolitano should go. Today would be just fine, Janet, for a nice resignation letter. Or, if Barry has the ballz, a (fuzzy?) cowboy boot to your ass.

Dick Cheney...
"As I’ve watched the events of the last few days it is clear once again that President Obama is trying to pretend we are not at war. He seems to think if he has a low key response to an attempt to blow up an airliner and kill hundreds of people, we won’t be at war. He seems to think if he gives terrorists the rights of Americans, lets them lawyer up and reads them their Miranda rights, we won’t be at war. He seems to think if we bring the mastermind of 9/11 to New York, give him a lawyer and trial in civilian court, we won’t be at war.

“He seems to think if he closes Guantanamo and releases the hard-core al Qaeda trained terrorists still there, we won’t be at war. He seems to think if he gets rid of the words, ‘war on terror,’ we won’t be at war. But we are at war and when President Obama pretends we aren’t, it makes us less safe. Why doesn’t he want to admit we’re at war? It doesn’t fit with the view of the world he brought with him to the Oval Office. It doesn’t fit with what seems to be the goal of his presidency – social transformation—the restructuring of American society. President Obama’s first object and his highest responsibility must be to defend us against an enemy that knows we are at war." [emboldenings mine]
Good to hear from a real man, one who knows what's needed.

Listen up, Barry. You're supposed to take charge, make the right decisions, have the buck stop at your desk. A good start would be booting Napolitano.

Or yourself.

Wednesday, August 12, 2009

Just in today, from Americans for Limited Government (ALG)...
In April of this year, the Obama Administration deliberately – and deceptively -- used a frighteningly kooky website to condemn tens of millions of innocent Americans who have fought for their country, cherish the sanctity of life, or stand up for the 10th Amendment.

There is simply no other way to put it.

In its now-discredited “Report on Rightwing Extremism,” Obama’s Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security warned every police department in the country that veterans, right-to-lifers, and states’ rights advocates were potential terrorists who warranted intense scrutiny. In response to that report, Americans for Limited Government filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request demanding to know how DHS had arrived at such a chilling conclusion.

The response from DHS is stunning.

As it turns out, Janet Napolitano’s DHS did not conduct even the most rudimentary research or investigation. It did no statistical analysis. It did not even bother to interview those it accused and allow them the opportunity to defend themselves.

Instead, in what should send shockwaves throughout the nation, DHS functionaries simply cruised the Internet (in tin-foil hats, no doubt) and relied entirely upon some of the most disreputable sites on the web to stage its attack upon its “rightwing” targets.

One of those 'Right Wing Extremist' sites is WhatDoesItMean dot com, a whacker site that features images of Noah's Ark, angels, dragons, unicorns, Masonic symbols, 9-11 Truther logos ... you name it, if it's whaaako, that site's got it. From that one site, lovely and gracious Janet Napolitano decides that everyone to her immediate right is whacky. Barack Obama obviously agrees.

Bill Wilson, ALG President, calls on Janet Napolitano to resign immediately. Well, that's not going to happen with our current President and Congress, because they are all to the left, with Obama, and most of 'em support whatever lovely Janet has to say. There will be no justice or fairness in Washington until 2010, when the mid term elections bring in some needed CHANGE.

Can you imagine the hostility the forces of the Left would unleash if, say, a right-wing sort went to Huffington Post and chronicled their fanaticisms, and tried to fashion government policy from that visit? Or, even farther to the left (but not by much) those bottom-feeders at Daily KOS, Eschaton (Atrios), Sadly, No!, Democratic Underground, any of those left-freaker sites?

Another site lovely Janet Reno visits (oops, I meant Janet Napolitano, didn't I?) is the extremist Southern Poverty Law Center, who sees white sheets and burning crosses everywhere they look. If they can't find any, they will invent 'em. They serve no useful purpose; like the Klan, they have outlived their usefulness. Now, they are simply a tool of the far left, and feed Janet Reno Napolitano's wildest dreams. What she should be investigating in some of Obama's illegal and unconstitutional CZAR 's.

I hope Barack Obama gets a leash for some of his high-level 'pets'. Lovely Janet could wear pink, don't you think?

Wednesday, April 15, 2009

We have a representative Republic that’s currently under assault by far-left ‘progressives’ who've spend inordinate amounts of time and money (community organizing with ACORN, for example) recruiting the poor and the perennially envious to attack the foundational core of our Republic: our proven capitalist economic system. Greed, envy and class hatred are the prime motivators of the current Democrat-leftist power system. All these base emotions they use effectively to push this nation farther and farther to the left, away from capitalism.

The left’s desire is to strip the ‘evil corporations’ of much of their profits, and take their executive compensation packages down to the levels where the majority of these envious ACORN-bred haters feel comfortable (no doubt a ‘get even’ approach), will eventually result in these corporations and industries nationalized (for the FAIRNESS!). The government's Keynesian bailouts are the tools and levers of nationalization; and never should have occurred.

The U.S. Congress has committed (spent) (well, printed and borrowed from foreign nations, in essence stolen from our grandkids) over $10 TRILLION since the last quarter of 2008 in ‘bailouts’ to make up for the decades of erroneous social and fiscal policies that finally came home to roost. These ‘government bailouts of corporate America’ are an ongoing mistake that may prove to be destructively grievous. Nail in the coffin, America.

But as long as bailouts and nationalization fit nicely with our current administration's political direction (who’s letting this perfect crisis go to waste?), who’s complaining? And if anyone does complain…Janet Napolitano has a response for that, no?

Fuck ‘em. I’m moving to Texas.

Tuesday, July 3, 2007

Why does Illegal Immigration exist in our country? Not just because the Federal Government is so lax in it's responsibility when it comes to border security (there is really no excuse for that, Uncle Sam), nor is it completely the lure of our culture (our streets aren't paved with gold, but it's a fact that our social programs, including our free Health Care, are worth crossing the Rio Grande or the Sonoran Desert for, especially if there isn't anyone there to say no...)

The main, most cited reason to come here is Jobs. Jobs provided by employers who want to minimize labor costs and benefits, and maximize profits.

It's simple Capitalism, and it works well. If Illegal Immigration hadn't become so widespread, and hadn't started costing Cities and States Taxpayers major bucks, and if the Immigrants themselves had tried to assimilate, we could have gone on practically ignoring the influx. But, no, now Illegal Immigration (and the current 12-20 Million who are here, and don't want to leave) is the major issue in our political discourse (even eclipsing the Middle East wars, for a time). We have to change direction, at the Federal Level. But not everyone is waiting for Uncle Sam to wise up...

Look to Janet Napolitano to lead us. Arizona Gov. Janet Napolitano just signed into Arizona law a tough new statute, cracking down on...illegal employers. Cracking down, hard, on the magnets that are drawing the crowds, the employers who have provided the jobs that illegals crave...
Gov. Janet Napolitano on Monday signed sweeping legislation against employers of undocumented workers, targeting the state's market for illegal labor with what she called "the most aggressive action in the country."

The penalty for violators: the suspension of a business license on the first violation and permanent revocation on a second, amounting to a death sentence for repeat offenders.
Lose your license, then if your greed doesn't subside, lose your bidness. I like this!
"It's monumental. It's a change from anything we've done in the past," said Speaker of the House Jim Weiers, R-Phoenix. "It's time for the states to start stepping up and stop waiting for Congress."
There's a few flaws to work out of the law before it takes effect January 1, such as what to do if 'critical' businesses get targeted (Hospitals, Power Plants, Democratic voting rolls...)  Guess what? There are critics to this plan!
But opposition to the new law was swift, led by Latino activists and the business community. Eight minutes after the governor's announcement that she had signed the bill, the Arizona Chamber of Commerce issued a statement calling it "a crippling blow to Arizona business.
And this little side note on the picture...
State Reps. Ben Miranda (left) and Steve Gallardo, both Democrats, are unhappy with the governor's decision to sign the measure.


The Republicans in Arizona have sponsored and directed this legislation, to the chagrin of Democrats. Legal challenges are already in the works...can't you just smell the ACLU lurking? I wonder what laws a challenge woud be based on... The Illegals are lawbreakers, the Employers are lawbreakers, now this bill just adds some teeth to existing laws...how can Democrats find ways to challenge it? And why should they want to? (Oh, I forgot...they want the illegal's votes, and Dems are embittered with hatred of anything not progressive to their continuing meltdown of values in our culture!)

Let's hope the challenges fail, and Arizona gets this bill on the books and working...so the rest of the country can learn how it's done.

Powered by ScribeFire.

 

FREE HOT BODYPAINTING | HOT GIRL GALERRY