|
|---|
Showing posts with label Amanda MarKOS. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Amanda MarKOS. Show all posts
Thursday, January 6, 2011
Assange should've asked a simple question of his two now-accusatory femi-bimbos...
0 comments Posted by kotang at 6:41 AMThis inspired by Dr. Douglas' post featuring 'Bang and Blame' by R.E.M. (part of his ongoing series of posts sniping with the feminazia, including Maureen Tkacik and Sadly Doyle and that lardly lump of grease Michael Moore. Even arch-feminist Amanda (my cock is longer than yours!) Marcotte got involved. A miniseries I'd just as rather not have watched, because those sorts drive me to look at some women unfavorably. Ugly ducklings searching for a nest they'll never have.
But, R.E.M. One of my favorite '80's bands.
Hmmmph. 'Bang and Blame', that could be the descriptive theme song for Assange's two Girlfriends Friday.
Assange should've paid a professional for to service his relief; never turned to two lefty bimbos. Who could trust their sorts long enough to get one's pants off?
Anyways, I was reminded of R.E.M., so here's my favorite cut from Monster.
But the charges against him likely are.
Oh, the question he should've asked ? It's up there. See if you recognize it.
But, R.E.M. One of my favorite '80's bands.
Hmmmph. 'Bang and Blame', that could be the descriptive theme song for Assange's two Girlfriends Friday.
Assange should've paid a professional for to service his relief; never turned to two lefty bimbos. Who could trust their sorts long enough to get one's pants off?
Anyways, I was reminded of R.E.M., so here's my favorite cut from Monster.
I'm looking for an interruption,
do you believe?
You looking to dig my dreams
Be prepared for anything
You come into my little scene
Hooray hooray hip hip hooray
There's one thing I can guarantee:
You won't have to dig, dig too deep
Said leave me to lay, but touch me deep,
I don't sleep, I dream
I'll settle for a cup of coffee, but you know what I really need
Are you looking to drive my dreams?
You here to run my screens?
You come, deliver my demons
Hooray hooray hip hip hooray
Are you coming to ease my headache?
Do you give good head?
Am I good in bed?
I don't know, I guess so
I don't sleep, I dream
I'll settle for a cup of coffee, but you know what I really need
I'm looking for an interruption,
can you believe?
Some medicine for my headache
Hooray hooray hip hip hooray
I'm pitching for a new direction
Pinch me when I wake
Don't tell me my dreams are fake
you leave me to lay, you touch me deep,
I don't sleep, I dream
I'll settle for a cup of coffee, but you know what I really need
Leave me to lay, but touch me deep,
I don't sleep, I dream
I'll settle for a cup of coffee, but you know what I really need
Don't tell me my dreams are fake
But the charges against him likely are.
Oh, the question he should've asked ? It's up there. See if you recognize it.
Friday, November 5, 2010
Why did Democrats get their butts shellacked so decisively in 2010? It's their IDEOLOGY, stupid.
0 comments Posted by kotang at 5:41 AMA well-written essay by TNR's William Galston (he's far from being a Conservative writer; but to improve my 'center-right' cred I'll link to him this time) uses 'just the facts, ma'am' to show Democrats exactly where they went wrong.
It's putting numbers to a theme I've been pushing here for years now: the once-proud Democrat Party has been taken over by a far-left sliver of it's ideological base, and The Party of Donkey is now paying for it; because, you see, America the U.S. of A, the Republic that's stood for 234 years, is NOT a Left-Leaning Nation; we can't survive if we are forced by the Left in too far a pendulum swing in that direction. We are center-right, and the ideological purists on the Left dragged us too far in the wrong direction.
Barack Obama might seem to some to some of these far-left critics, the bloggers and pundits and other various assholes (Grayson, Markos 'The Pussy' Moulitsas, the Dust Witch Ariana Huffington) to be drifting towards center from their far-left bastion, but that's just not the case. BHO is adrift in his own vacant lot: he was raised by a Communist father (or fathered by a Communist mentor, take your pick); schooled in the company of (by his own admission) far-left Marxists and radicals and even actual real-death-bomb-throwers, then polished in the Church of Black Liberation Theology by the uber-crazy Jeremiah Wright. BHO is NOT a good man, and should never have been elected as U.S. President. Democrats should've listened to Bill and Hillary; they tried to warn.
So, Mr. Galston's numbers. After putting to bed the tired old excuses 'old people did this to us because we're taking their Medicare!' and 'young people didn't get out and vote like they did before!' and 'the far-left Dem base deserted because Obama didn't do enough!' we get to the REAL REASON: Independents don't like far-left behaviors, and it shows ...
It'll do you a world of good, and the nation, too.
It's putting numbers to a theme I've been pushing here for years now: the once-proud Democrat Party has been taken over by a far-left sliver of it's ideological base, and The Party of Donkey is now paying for it; because, you see, America the U.S. of A, the Republic that's stood for 234 years, is NOT a Left-Leaning Nation; we can't survive if we are forced by the Left in too far a pendulum swing in that direction. We are center-right, and the ideological purists on the Left dragged us too far in the wrong direction.
Barack Obama might seem to some to some of these far-left critics, the bloggers and pundits and other various assholes (Grayson, Markos 'The Pussy' Moulitsas, the Dust Witch Ariana Huffington) to be drifting towards center from their far-left bastion, but that's just not the case. BHO is adrift in his own vacant lot: he was raised by a Communist father (or fathered by a Communist mentor, take your pick); schooled in the company of (by his own admission) far-left Marxists and radicals and even actual real-death-bomb-throwers, then polished in the Church of Black Liberation Theology by the uber-crazy Jeremiah Wright. BHO is NOT a good man, and should never have been elected as U.S. President. Democrats should've listened to Bill and Hillary; they tried to warn.
So, Mr. Galston's numbers. After putting to bed the tired old excuses 'old people did this to us because we're taking their Medicare!' and 'young people didn't get out and vote like they did before!' and 'the far-left Dem base deserted because Obama didn't do enough!' we get to the REAL REASON: Independents don't like far-left behaviors, and it shows ...
We get more significant results when we examine the choices Independents made. Although their share of the electorate was virtually unchanged from 2006, their behavior was very different. In 2006, Democrats received 57 percent of the Independent vote, versus only 39 percent for Republicans. In 2010 this margin was reversed: 55 percent Republican, 39 percent Democratic. If Independents had split their vote between the parties this year the way they did in 2006, the Republicans share would have been 4.7 percent lower—a huge difference.So, it's clearly spelled out in the numbers. Change, Democrats, drop the far-left idiots who've destroyed your party's credibility. Send 'em packing, come back home, enjoy a NASCAR event, eat a hot dog instead of arugula, and lay off the memes for a change.
But why did they change? Here we reach the nub of the matter: The ideological composition of the electorate shifted dramatically. In 2006, those who voted were 32 percent conservative, 47 percent moderate, and 20 percent liberal. In 2010, by contrast, conservatives had risen to 41 percent of the total and moderates declined to 39 percent, while liberals remained constant at 20 percent. And because, in today’s polarized politics, liberals vote almost exclusively for Democrats and conservatives for Republicans, the ideological shift matters a lot.
...
So the 2010 electorate does not represent a disproportional mobilization of conservatives: If the 2010 electorate had perfectly reflected the voting-age population, it would actually have been a bit more conservative and less moderate than was the population that showed up at the polls. Unless the long-term decline of moderates and rise of conservatives is reversed during the next two years, the ideological balance of the electorate in 2012 could look a lot like it did this year.
It'll do you a world of good, and the nation, too.
Monday, June 21, 2010
Spiked Female Condom (with TEETH!) invented for to fight rape. Someone owes Amanda Marcotte a finder's fee?
0 comments Posted by kotang at 5:20 AMThe Rape aXe.
Dr. Sonnet Ehlers, South Africa, invents what God didn't...
Well and good for rapists to suffer this, and more (I'd rather see 'em catch a .38 from a Lady Smith) but what about when a vindictive woman (no! never been any of those!) puts one of these things on, or in, and pays back that lout who dared dump her for Gwyndolyn at the Senior Prom ?
If a device can be used for good, it can be misused just as easily for alleviating scorn.
But, if it catches one rapist (and the rape victim can then get away without further injury from the wounded, maddened beast, and the rapist's ass goes to a cell where 'rape' is 'splained to it every night by helpful cellmates) then it's all worthwhile.
I still think the .38 is a better solution, though. No need to go through the initial ordeal.
«« Lady Smith by Smith & Wesson
Dr. Sonnet Ehlers, South Africa, invents what God didn't...
(CNN) -- South African Dr. Sonnet Ehlers was on call one night four decades ago when a devastated rape victim walked in. Her eyes were lifeless; she was like a breathing corpse.Damn. I'm hurting just thinking of this device.
"She looked at me and said, 'If only I had teeth down there,'" recalled Ehlers, who was a 20-year-old medical researcher at the time. "I promised her I'd do something to help people like her one day."
...
The woman inserts the latex condom like a tampon. Jagged rows of teeth-like hooks line its inside and attach on a man's penis during penetration, Ehlers said.
Once it lodges, only a doctor can remove it -- a procedure Ehlers hopes will be done with authorities on standby to make an arrest.
"It hurts, he cannot pee and walk when it's on," she said. "If he tries to remove it, it will clasp even tighter... however, it doesn't break the skin, and there's no danger of fluid exposure."
Well and good for rapists to suffer this, and more (I'd rather see 'em catch a .38 from a Lady Smith) but what about when a vindictive woman (no! never been any of those!) puts one of these things on, or in, and pays back that lout who dared dump her for Gwyndolyn at the Senior Prom ?
If a device can be used for good, it can be misused just as easily for alleviating scorn.
But, if it catches one rapist (and the rape victim can then get away without further injury from the wounded, maddened beast, and the rapist's ass goes to a cell where 'rape' is 'splained to it every night by helpful cellmates) then it's all worthwhile.
«« Lady Smith by Smith & Wesson
Tuesday, February 16, 2010
Barack Obama's official Twitterer - Face Booker - My Spaceweaseler, Mia Cambronero, is a far-left product of far, far left George Soros-funded MoveOn dot org(y).
0 comments Posted by kotang at 4:15 AM
The woman that poses as Barack Obama on all his social networking websites such as Facebook, MySpace, and Twitter is connected to the far-left organization MoveOn.org....
On Friday, the Wall Street Journal revealed the identity of the current Twitterer as Mia Cambronero.
Our friends at Sweetness & Light have discovered that she is a senior fellow at the New Organizing Institute which is described by Discover The Networks ...Go read the rest.
Bottom line, we have yet another reason to doubt BHO's sincerity as to his desire to ever govern in or even near the center, or attract any support from someone who isn't already some sort of leftard. If BHO can't pick a Personal Twitterer who's more like, say, middle American than obviously like a freakin' Marxist, how can he expect to get his more 'official' nominees approved? "Online Organizer", indeed. She looks like an Amanda Marcotte playtoy.
Just another Barack Obama All-American mistake.
Sunday, April 27, 2008
Amanda Marcotte's new book "It's a Jungle Out There" is causing much internal strife amongst feminists. Because of the '40 era comic book imagery used, both on the cover and inside the book. Supposedly racist, sexist, and every politically correct -ist and -ism you can imagine. Amanda is being savaged on feminazi blogs across the spectrum.
Don't you hate it when leftists eat their own? ;D
Go see the book's internal images (taken in a bookstore, obviously) here. I could post them, but won't. They aren't in color, and each has a big, fat thumb (sloppy technique, that) holding the book open.
Seal Press, the book's publisher, has keeled over with a public apology. Amanda Marcotte has another. Feminist blogs are screaming bloody
Jeff Goldstein has an excellent essay up. Classic Goldstein. You'll have to visit there and read it.
Hilarity ensues.
I can only approve...and enjoy!
Oh, and this..."Bungle in the Jungle", Jethro Tull.
saving their nuts for a Sunday....
crossed from the PW Pub
Sunday, April 13, 2008
...not that this one is remarkable or anything. But, don't click on it unless you want to be...startled.
This innocuous little 'chop is a quick response to Hillary Clinton's visit for Pizza and Beer last night in Crown Point, Indiana; a celebration, obviously, of Snob-ama's latest misfortunate commentary concerning us poor gun-and-bible totin' humble-visaged Typical White Folk. Thanks to commenter Pablo for pointing to the link this morning. You would think Hillary would celebrate with something more than beer; yes, she took a shot of Crown Royal as well. But her face here says "Jack" all the way.
Hidden away under that horn swaggler is parody sure to be troubling to feminazia everywhere...
Darleen Click posted an essay on the problems facing some Colorado College students who happened to parody an on-campus feminist newsletter called "The Monthly Rag"...from the Denver Post article...
"A satirical response to a feminist publication at Colorado College has landed the college and two of its students in the middle of a fierce debate over freedom of speech.Of course. The Monthly Rag. Darleen writes
"Chris Robinson and another student at the Colorado Springs institution decided to print "The Monthly Bag" after seeing copies of a feminist and gender studies newsletter, "The Monthly Rag," in restrooms around campus.
"The edition of "The Monthly Rag" that prompted action included an announcement for a talk on feminist pornography, information on gender-bending practices, and a tidbit about a myth involving male castration. According to Robinson, it was representative of what appears every month."
"By what rationale does Colorado College deem the parody flier “threatening?” According to Mike Edmonds,vice president for student life at Colorado College, it is because of “the juxtaposition of weaponry and sexuality.”So, feminists can have their rag and bleed us too.
"What Edmonds intentionally forgot to say was it is because of the juxtaposition of stereotypical masculine sexuality and weaponry. The Monthly Rag (which last time I checked is a play on a crude reference to menstruation — and any male who uses such a reference is liable to have a murder of feminists after him demanding blood) juxtapostions mention of castration along with feminist porn and carrying dildos."
Of course, I have my own parody version of "The Monthly Rag".
But because this is an "R" rated blog, you'll have to click out to see it...
Wednesday, November 21, 2007
See it? Markos Moulitsas brings the BDS to Newsweek. This repackaged Bushitlerchenyburton nonsense isn't anything new, or worthy of even use as a birdcageliner.
Not that I would buy Newsweek before (there's not much for blog readers to pick up from such a tired old source as a printed weekly) but if I did, this would be the drop-and-walk-away issue. To actually go out and ask Markos, the penultimate BDS Nutroot, the canny Leftist with the most marked hatred for Conservatives, this guy is worst-case selection for any media source to pick for a columnist. Selling copies of a near-forgotten newsweekly is getting more difficult, I suppose, so here's the 'cure'. Sell to the rabid fanbase in leftyworld. I'm speechless (well, no, but I'll point you to the blogger who has the best read on Mr. KOS, Dennis the Peasant...
"Other than having Amanda Marcotte edit it for clarity, I'm not sure what he could have done to make his column worse than it actually is. Markos, thy name is VAPID. Oh sure, this sort of thing keeps the Netroots hordes happy, but does Markos really think that yet another 800 words of thoroughly generic Blame Bush For Everything from yet another movement partisan is going to make Hillary Clinton, Barak Obama or John Edwards look more attractive to undecided voters?Yes, we need Amanda Markos in the mass mediaumb. We need more of the same Bush Bashing that goes on to fuel more separation anxiety in our populace. As if worrying about an impending financial downturn (just how far down we don't really want to know, I'm afraid) and a Mhadman who's using Hitleresque 'Invincibility'speak...
Oy."
"The American administration must know that it is facing a united and invincible nation," Ahmadinejad said in the speech that was broadcast live on state television."Does anyone think for a minute that any Democrat who's railed against our wars on Terror (in Afghanistan and Iraq, no matter how well-justified) will now come together to oppose Iran's nuclear ambitions? Especially with KOS kids on the loose and bashing Bush at every opportunity? We're in this war, we need to get behind the troops for better or worse and win the thing.
Karl Rove was selected to 'oppose' MarKos in Newsweek. Really, I don't think I want to hear from him, either.
Thursday, February 15, 2007
These awards are for all those useless guys who, for some strange reason, didn't take proper care of their ladies on Valentines's Day...you know, forgot the roses or candy, didn't get a big enough rock to suite thier sweethearts...
___________________________________________________________________________________
There's also those guys who strive to do the best they can, but fall a little short of expectations...
_____________________________________________________________________________________
These awards, however, are usually reserved for REAL MEN who KNOW their women, and know their equipment, and prefer their equipment...
__________________________________________________________________________________
So, you ask, why is Amanda Marcotte winning the Grand Prize, or even mentioned in a post that includes the word "Valentine"? (Well it is post-Valentine, but still...) And why should she win the grand prize in an "Award" exclusively devoted to 'Man of the Year'?
Well, not wanting to be labled part and parcel of the patriarchy, I had to let her slide in, because, you know, I'm so politically correct...
So, you say, what did I get for my bestest half? Feast your eyes on this...
...and know, she did too~!
;D
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
