Star One Smart Blog's

From the diary of a Lefty blogger at Firedog Lake, a link to the Nashville Post; from there, this FOX News blog. Seems Tom Tancredo spoke to the Tea Party, had this to say...

"People who could not spell the word vote or say it in English put a committed socialist ideologue in the White House -- name is Barack Hussein Obama," he said. "The revolution has come. It was led by the cult of multiculturalism aided by leftist liberals all over who don't have the same ideas about America as we do."

Good shot, Tom.

You have the howls of the left to your credit. The punk at Firedog Lake is calling for Sarah Palin to step away from the microphone tomorrow, to show her solidarity with...Obama.

Not expecting that to happen, Seminal One.

Had I made that speech, I would’ve changed just one thing: instead of pointing a solitary finger at voters who might not be able to spell the English word “vote”, I would have gestured with all my middle fingers at, and included all voters who were lured to vote for Obama and his coattail-bumping leftist Democrats by ACORN and other ‘Community Organizers'. Because they lured those single-minded simple-minded Obama voters with carrots on sticks.

These targeted, ‘organized’, voters (let’s call them MOOCHERS, because that’s a perfect descriptor) were promised Other People’s Money.

The Democrats they elected (we’ll term them LOOTERS because they definitely want to redistribute them some wealth) did win, because America today is mostly made up of the soft, the weak, and with that sort of 'gimme mine!, or someone's!' attitude, we are all ripe for a fall (remember the words of Benjamin Franklin, “Once the people find they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the Republic.” Easily swayed by a couple of glib speeches, by vague promises of HOPE and CHANGE that are proving to be undeliverable, these simple voters voted their greed.

And got our attention.

Obama's election was a grand coming-out party for looters, promising money that doesn’t even exist, to expectant, hands-out weaklings who only want to suckle the government’s teat. Promise them the money, they will bring the Democrat vote. Every time. It's a characteristic sign of weakness.

Because of the socialistic nature of Barack Obama (he has said he wants to redistribute wealth, after all), sure, he’s as Tancredo portrayed him. CHANGE, baby; Obama lured millions of people who simply want something for nothing. PUMP MY FREE GAS, BITCHES!

So, Tom Tancredo, to correct your speechifying a bit, just widen the scope of the set of all people who are responsible for voting in Obama and his phalanx of dirty socialists to include all the moochers and looters who make up the modern, progressive, leftist Democrat party.

Bunch of 'holes, all of 'em.

---