|
|---|
Saturday, March 3, 2007
Democrats are in apoplexy over Ann Coutler's possible slur yesterday. Ann, at a conservative party might have called John Edwards a 'faggot'...
My observation on Ann's remark: So What?
With all of the angry rhetoric, hateful, spiteful trashtalk that's spewed from Democrats, targeting President Bush over the last few years, there isn't much that's a big deal about Ann Coulter putting a little dig in her remarks towards poor ole' sweet-ass John Edwards (who hired, then fired, one of the most hate-filled and bigoted Democratic mouthpieces to ever disgrace the discourse, the guttural-talented Amanda Marcotte, who targets all people who believe in God (few Democrats are in that camp, today), a group of good people who numbers are considerably greater than the subset 'rump wranglers', at least for now).
So, the Number One Democrat, Howard (teh SCREAM) Dean (jeeze, that's the dude who should really open his mouth about anyone else's commentary; given he rose to power by bashing Bush, and on little else of substance) comes out crying
Ann Coulter is not a political candidate. Ann is a very good-looking, sharp-tounged pundit who is not elected to anything, nor is she running for any office. Ann can say whatever she likes, can write whatever books she wants to write, and Howard Dean and the Democratic crew of cretinous cutthroats who've Bashed Bush for all these years can kiss each other's asses...which is pretty much what this is all about, I suppose, the Democrats protecting their own...
You go, grrlll...I'm definitely on your side in this fight.
"I was going to have a few comments on the other Democratic presidential candidate John Edwards, but it turns out you have to go into rehab if you use the word 'faggot,' so I - so kind of an impasse, can't really talk about Edwards."OK, so that pretty much was calling Edwards a San Francisco Treat, I suppose...high in the loafers, whatever. Give Ann some credit for brilliant observational talent...Edwards looks like such a sweet guy!
My observation on Ann's remark: So What?
With all of the angry rhetoric, hateful, spiteful trashtalk that's spewed from Democrats, targeting President Bush over the last few years, there isn't much that's a big deal about Ann Coulter putting a little dig in her remarks towards poor ole' sweet-ass John Edwards (who hired, then fired, one of the most hate-filled and bigoted Democratic mouthpieces to ever disgrace the discourse, the guttural-talented Amanda Marcotte, who targets all people who believe in God (few Democrats are in that camp, today), a group of good people who numbers are considerably greater than the subset 'rump wranglers', at least for now).
So, the Number One Democrat, Howard (teh SCREAM) Dean (jeeze, that's the dude who should really open his mouth about anyone else's commentary; given he rose to power by bashing Bush, and on little else of substance) comes out crying
“While Democrats and Republicans may disagree on the issues, we should all be able to agree that this kind of vile rhetoric is out of bounds. The American people want a serious, thoughtful debate of the issues,”When has Howard Dean ever had a serious, thougtful debate on any subject dealing with Republicans, or Bush? Laughable!
Ann Coulter is not a political candidate. Ann is a very good-looking, sharp-tounged pundit who is not elected to anything, nor is she running for any office. Ann can say whatever she likes, can write whatever books she wants to write, and Howard Dean and the Democratic crew of cretinous cutthroats who've Bashed Bush for all these years can kiss each other's asses...which is pretty much what this is all about, I suppose, the Democrats protecting their own...
You go, grrlll...I'm definitely on your side in this fight.
powered by performancing firefox
0 Comments:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
