Star One Smart Blog's

He shouldn't have gotten it in the first place, obviously; he hadn't done anything yet but loudly bash George Bush for years for jumping into wars unprovoked. Now that BHO is Commander in Chief of the United States of America, he's failed to live up to the expectations of the Nobel Peace Prize committee. First, he didn't immediately pull out of Iraq and Afghanistan as he promised he would; now, he's slinging Tomahawk missiles and bombing civilians with the best of 'em.

What a doofus he is.

From Sky News...

Take away Obama's Peace Prize

Bolivian President Evo Morales has called for US President Barack Obama's Nobel Peace Prize to be revoked following his decision to attack Libya.

'Two years ago we heard that President Barack Obama had won the Nobel Peace Prize, but is he defending peace in the world now, or isn't he instead fomenting violence?' Morales told reporters, days after Obama ordered the bombing of Libya military targets as part of an UN-approved effort to protect civilians.

'How is it possible to give the Nobel Peace Prize to someone who has launched an invasion, a bombing? It's a violation, an assault, an aggression,' said Morales, one of Latin America's most left-leaning leaders and a vocal critic of the United States.

'Obama is the leader of group of thugs who led an assault and an invasion - and that has nothing to do with defending human rights,' he declared.

From Russia, another opinion...

Russia’s Zhirinovsky calls to revoke Obama’s Nobel Peace Prize

Russia’s head of the Liberal Democratic Party, Vladimir Zhirinovsky, has appealed to the Nobel Prize Committee to revoke U.S. President Barack Obama’s Nobel Prize, the party’s press service said in a statement on Monday.

Obama received the Nobel Peace Prize in 2009 for his commitment to non-proliferation of nuclear weapons.

“The situation in Libya is yet another shocking act of aggression by NATO forces and in particular by the United States. This is a clear reflection of colonial policy. This is another crude invasion into the domestic affairs of an independent state. There is only one goal: to take control of Libyan oil and the Libyan regime and not saving the Libyan people,” the press service quoted Zhirinovsky as saying.

More International reaction. Canada's Globe and Mail...

We’re fighting War Lite, without leadership or goals

The half-heartedness of the intervenors against the manic determination of Col. Gadhafi; the ragtag rebels against his better-armed and -trained pretorians; our concession of control of the ground to him for unwillingness to put any of our boots there – it all seems to bode something less than a glorious victory. No war is a bargain except for those who can afford it, but cheap, half-hearted ones aren’t bargains for anyone.

We knew when BHO assumed the office that foreign policy would suffer, that he (as a Democrat, and a far-left one at that) wouldn't be up to the task of running the armed forces. What we are seeing now is proof.

Jimmy Carter failed miserably in the desert; he withdrew in shame after the failed hostage rescue attempt in Iran. This one is just one small slip away from doing the same sort of flight reaction.

Because he sure doesn't know how to fight.

---