Star One Smart Blog's

A powerful article in the Canadian Free Press this weekend presents a plausible worse-case scenario concerning our stumbling, flailing, fumbling, failing American President's adventure in voodoo Keyensian Economics. Nothing new here, really; it's nice to see these things written and presented with such alacrity. Some snippets...

"Barack has a Private Language problem with his Obamanomics, in that he promises his ideas will work, despite any evidence to the contrary – regardless of how illogical the ideas seem, how contrary the math turns out to be, or despite how contradictory the current outcome is. Barack blankly claims we must just put our faith in him because of his profound economic knowledge. But isn’t it possible Obama has already made a terrible decision to waste nearly a trillion dollars on a Stimulus Bill that did not keep unemployment from topping 8%, as promised? Further, claiming jobs were created or “saved” by the Bill, despite hard evidence that eight million folks have lost their job during Obama’s tenure, seems sheer sophistry.

"Critics have further pointed out the Stimulus Bill was not built for stimulus, to begin with. Instead, borrowed money will be spent for years, which was not the immediate jolt of adrenaline most assumed would occur when it was passed. But these facts certainly help explain why unemployment has hovered near 10% for months, as total unemployment – by every category – is now supposedly 17%. Yet the administration has talked about another “stimulus” or “jobs” bill that would cost hundreds of billions more."

There was much mention that this policy of "borrow now, print now to stimulate later, oh, and don't worry about the interest, our grandkids have us covered!" was methodology timed to make sure Democrats got the needed pork-monies during their re-election cycles; much of it specifically in 2012. Who knew? We did, those of us who had open eyes.

"We must now ask why Obama would want to purposely damage the US economy, if his depredations are not accidental? The answer could quite simply be that Barack Obama is a genuine communist. In fact, most of his family were either sympathetic to socialism or Marxism, including both fathers, his mother, his grandparents, a childhood mentor Mr. Davis, his friends Bill Ayers and Bernadine Dohrn, his pastor of two decades Rev. Wright, and even members of his White House team, like Van Jones. So, since water seeks its own level, the idea of Obama actually carrying Marxist values inside his heart would hardly seem shocking, given his background.

"Now, if Barack is a closet Marxist, then his beliefs teach him that free market capitalism is a bad thing and it hurts people. So, destroying our capitalist economy would result in liberation of many American people, since capitalism is an unfair and wicked economic system. In other words, since Marxists hate capitalism because they believe it is evil, to destroy capitalism helps people who are slaves in that type economy. Karl Marx once wrote, “Capital is dead labor, which, vampire-like, lives only by sucking living labor, and lives the more, the more labor it sucks.”

The meat of the article. Barack Hussein Obama, if he is secretly still a Marxist, is hell-bent on bringing about CHANGE no matter who or what stands in his way. If this is true, he is in office as a liar, having taken an oath to uphold and protect the U.S. Constitution. As a constitutional lawyer, he knows it's weaknesses. Who better to be a closet Marxist saboteur?

"Obama is certainly far left in his policies. And following the careers of the great Marxist leaders, whether Lenin, Stalin or Mao, reveals them all to have been furiously arrogant and utterly misinformed upon economics, and their stupid mistakes lead to the deaths of tens of millions. Perhaps this is inevitable, given Marxism’s utter contempt for the details of capitalism. But the question remains – is Obama simply a misinformed, yet well-meaning economic misfit; or is he intent on crashing American capitalism to implement the huge changes he ominously promised during his campaign?

"Barack’s relentless confidence might not be so much from his belief that his atomic Keynesian routine will work. Instead, it just might be because he knows it will fail spectacularly. And if it does, Obama will be in a great position to implement socialism or Marxism to “save” America from its evil Capitalist soul."

I certainly hope that this speculation is merely speculation. Let's just hope that he's only a saucer-eyed beginner who doesn't know any better, making these misguided mistakes that probably won't destroy our economy. And that if we can just make it to 2012, we can get the adults back in the White House.

Aren't you glad we who are not of the far-left bent, of the new-styled mind-numbed socialisty Democrat party of CHANGE at ALL COSTS, are keeping a close eye on Barack Hussein Obama?

---